no
The reason for repeating an experiment is to either verify or disprove the original finding.
they didnt
conducting experiment
To prove or disprove a theory. If you didn't perform experiments you wouldn't have the evidence to move forward in your scientific knowledge. Try an experiment 4 times to get a reliable average result.
Scientists use experiments to either confirm or disprove their hypotheses. Without this experimentation, science could not advance.
An experiment can prove or disprove a hypothesis.
The broad basis of an investigation is to either prove or disprove the facts - be they criminal, civil, scientific, and so on.
You might start by making some simple experiments on your own, to confirm or disprove your assumptions.
Scientists used evidence, analysis, and experiments to disprove alchemy.
To prove the hypothesis. To disprove the hypothesis.
The reason for repeating an experiment is to either verify or disprove the original finding.
they didnt
conducting experiment
They set out to test a hypothesis by using experiments and controls. They then adjust the experiments and run the tests again until they either prove or disprove it.
Your hypothesis is supported by the data. You cannot prove a hypothesis because somebody may do some other experiments and disprove it eventually. You can only disprove a hypothesis or indicate that it is supported by the data.
Scientists were expected to conduct experiments to prove / disprove their hypothesis and theories.
Observations made using microscopes in the 19th century, such as Louis Pasteur's experiments, showed that spontaneous generation of life from non-living matter did not occur. Instead, they provided evidence for the theory of biogenesis, which states that living organisms can only arise from pre-existing living organisms. This helped to disprove the earlier theory of spontaneous generation.