One example of (rational) illogical thinking is gambling. Another one is speeding and tailgating both known to be regular causes of car crashes. In gambling our logical thinking states that the odds are way against us. Yet, because of the excitement at the possibility of winning, even are remote as it might be, we go on and place our bet anyway. In driving, speeding above the speed limit does very little in the objective we place on the activity: saving time. Speeding is only on segments of a road. It can only be done on specific sections of a street, road or highway. Yet, what matters is the total time used in getting to our destination. Passing other vehicles just wastes a lot of fuel for the number of feet gained in distance. A traffic control device, traffic, or single lane exit will usually cancel any time "gained." A steady cruise speed at or below the speed limit will assure the least amount of fuel used. Any increase above the speed limit, usually 5 or 10 mph, gains seconds or parts of seconds per mile. It is illogical to think that speeding gains time.
Yes, illogical refers to reasoning or actions that lack coherence or fail to follow established principles of logic. It often manifests in contradictions, fallacies, or conclusions that do not align with the premises provided. While some phenomena may seem illogical, they can sometimes be understood through different perspectives or frameworks. Ultimately, what appears illogical to one person may make sense within another context or system of thought.
Seligman's theory of learned helplessness and cognitive behavioral therapy emphasizes the importance of examining multiple pieces of evidence to challenge and dispute illogical beliefs. Rather than relying on a single piece of evidence, it encourages individuals to analyze various experiences and viewpoints to gain a more balanced perspective. This approach fosters resilience and helps identify patterns of thinking that may contribute to negative emotions or behaviors. Ultimately, the goal is to cultivate a more rational and empowering mindset.
Partialism is a major flaw in thinking in which the thinker fixates on only part of the issue at hand. It usually happens due to inadequacy of information or perception, and it can be intentional or not. An example of partialism would be only thinking of the benefits of eating an entire box of chocolates in three minutes, or only thinking of the negatives of starting a new job.
They either are being humorous, or are asking a rhetorical question.
inaccurate Observation overgeneralization selective observation illogical reasoning ideology and politics
He was illogical in his thinking.
If by critical thinking you mean rational thinking, then illogical thinking is it's opposite and excludes it of necessity. If instead you simply mean "thinking that is effective", then illogical thinking interferes only insofar as rational thinking is effective. Our society holds up rational analysis as an ideal, but in some situations intuitive, seemingly illogical thought produces better results. Critical thinking is sequential. Each stage or step of the thought process must be analyzed and found to be correct before moving on to the next step and the next step. And so on toward a purposeful end. This is a structured process. For example: "If A then B, if B then C, if C then D." If each step is reasoned and correct then also: "if A then D follows." Illogical thinking would interfere with the sequence somewhere, interfering and breaking the chain. For example: "If A then B, if B then K, if C then D." There's no link from B to C, interfering with the sequence.
Illogical is from the Greek word logos (reason or thinking). The prefix il- signifies "without"
Yes, it is perfectly logical to do so, especially where considering the boundaries of logic itself, where that logic is applied in ways contrary to normal logic forms, or where suing logic to prove that the illogical truly is illogical (for example, proving that an assumption is incorrect as it would lead to a contradiction, the basis of RAA, means logically considering the illogical).
The psychodynamic model does not solely attribute abnormal behavior to illogical thinking patterns. Instead, it emphasizes unconscious conflicts, early childhood experiences, and unresolved emotional issues as key factors contributing to abnormal behavior. While illogical thinking may play a role, the psychodynamic model focuses on a deeper exploration of unconscious processes.
No, that is illogical thinking. Think about your question.
Rabbits are mammals and all rabbits have whiskers, so all mammals have whiskers.
Psychosis involving delusions and illogical thinking is a mental health condition characterized by a disconnection from reality, where individuals may hold false beliefs (delusions) that are resistant to reason or contrary evidence. This can include paranoid thoughts, grandiosity, or other irrational ideas. The illogical thinking may manifest in disorganized speech or behavior, making it difficult for the person to communicate effectively or function in daily life. Conditions such as schizophrenia and severe mood disorders can include these symptoms.
That is a contradiction in thinking and illogical. Something can't be young and old at the same time.
a person's past experiences shape their belief system and thinking patterns. People form illogical, irrational thinking patterns that become the cause of both their negative emotions and of further irrational ideas.
It's called illogical extrapolation.
the processes that are not logical are called illogical processes