1. To evaluate each others' methodology.
2. To combine knowledge from different areas to build up greater knowledge banks so we aren't being redundant.
3. To generate new ideas.
What is the purpose of communicating scientific information?
The purpose of communicating scientific information is so that information can be used to prove other reasonable scientific inferences.
No scientist knows everything or can do everything. Communication between scientists takes two forms. The first is informal communication or personal communication. This just involves talking to other scientists in the lunchroom or ringing or by e-mail to get ideas and solve problems.
The second is formal communication through writing papers in journals or presentations at a conference. Form this scientists can see if the work they are attempting has already been done in part or in full. They can then follow the work that has been done before by adding to it. There is no point in repeating somebody elses research that was done years ago. Another purpose of journal publication is to see if the work published can be repeated by someone else in another lab. Science isn't really valid unless it can be repeated somewhere else.
There should be enough information in the journal paper to repeat the results exactly if that is not possible then questions will be asked. A scientist will first contact the author to clarify and sort out any mistakes or omissions and then try again. If they are unsuccessful then they may publish disputing the results in the original paper. (they will be diplomatic saying something like "unlike author Dr A we found that something else happened") Without communication science wouldn't proceed at any pace as every scientist would be working isolation. As Newton said "If I have seen further it is only by standing on the shoulders of giants" meaning he could only do the great things he did by following the work of those that came before him.
communicating
Formally for a theory answer, no. In practice, yes. A very important part of the process of science requires that other researchers test new theories of others, which requires that it be communicated.
it is communicating.
they gave reasons to say that some races are weaker than others
It is NOT scientifically disputed as the overwhelming number of scientists accept evolutionary theory. Those scientists, and others, that do not accept the theory do so for religiously ideological reasons, though they try to rationalize this by pseudo scientific proposals.
communicating
communicating
Yes
It is important to seem confident when communicating to other because if you are confident with what your saying theperson you are speaking to will have confidence in it too.
Formally for a theory answer, no. In practice, yes. A very important part of the process of science requires that other researchers test new theories of others, which requires that it be communicated.
so that you can get a full understanding of the situation at hand
Understanding netiquette guidelines when communicating on the world wide web with friends, family, and others can be extremely important.
they gave reasons to say that some races are weaker than others
Because they don't have to talk to you. It's up to you to entyce them to find out about you. Otherwise you can become a loner.
they gave reasons to say that some races are weaker than others
they gave reasons to say that some races are weaker than others
If you don't adapt the way you communicate to meet the needs of others, you are not communicating; you might as well be talking to yourself, and probably are.