0
What else can I help you with?
When does a researcher generally form a hypothesis and make predictions?
when he gets problem
What are the techniques involved in defining a problem?
TECHNIQUES INVOLVED IN DEFINING A PROBLEM:As a researcher, you must have often read that defining a problem is the first step in a research process. But, haveyou ever wondered what is meant by ‘defining a problem’. Well, it simply means that the researcher has to laydown certain boundaries within which he/she has to study the problem with a pre-defined objective in mind.Defining a problem is a herculean task, and this must be done intelligently to avoid confusions that arise in theresearch operation. Try to follow the below steps systematically to best define a problem:i. State the problem in a general way:First state the problem in general terms with respect to some practical, scientific or intellectual interest. For this, theresearcher may himself read the concerned subject matter thoroughly or take the help of the subject expert. Often,the guide states the problem in general terms; it depends on the researcher if he/she wants to narrow it down tooperational terms. The problem stated should also be checked for ambiguity and feasibility.ii.Understand the nature of the problem:The next step is to understand the nature and origin of the problem. The researcher needs to discuss the problem withthose related to the subject matter in order to clearly understand the origin of the problem, its nature, objectives,and the environment in which the problem is to be studied.iii. Survey the available literature:All available literature including relevant theories, reports, records, and other relevant literature on the problem needsto be reviewed and examined. This would help the researcher to identify the data available, the techniques that mightbe used, types of difficulties that may be encountered during the study, possible analytical shortcomings, and even newmethods of approach to the present problem.iv. Go for discussions for developing ideas:The researcher may discuss the problem with his/her colleagues and others related to the concerned subject. Thishelps the researcher to generate new ideas, identify different aspects on the problem, gain suggestions and advicesfrom others, and sharpen his focus on certain aspects within the field. However, discussions should not be limited tothe problem only, but should also be related to the general approach to the problem, techniques that might be used,possible solutions, etc.v. Rephrase the research problem into a working proposition:Finally, the researcher must rephrase the problem into a working proposition. Rephrasing the problem means putting theproblem in specific terms that is feasible and may help in the development of working hypotheses. Once theresearcher has gone through the above steps systematically, it is easy to rephrase the problem into analytical andoperational terms.
How do you identify problem in scientific method?
The scientific method wasn't made to identify or solve a problem. It is a researcher tool, you start with a subject, do research, do an experiment to make sure it's correct (If it's not, then this might be the problem you are referring to) if it's correct you publish your results.Scientific method steps:Define a questionGather information and resources (observe)Form an explanatory hypothesisPerform an experiment and collect data, testing the hypothesisAnalyze the dataInterpret the data and draw conclusions that serve as a starting point for new hypothesis
What is the first thing you do in the scientific method?
you identify the problem.
The first step in scientific method is to define or identify the?
problem
What are the similarities between a problem statement and research questions?
they both use questions when a researcher attempts to answer when she/he undertaking a research.
A typical example of a research questions is: "What is the effect of reward system on productivity" What is the problem here, according to the researcher And what is a possible solution to the problem,according to the same researcher?
please give me an answer, I'm from Srilanka.
Skills of a good researcher?
Dedication and interest are some skills of a good researcher. A research should be determined to find the answer to their problem.
A computer crime researcher was overlooking a security problem with?
carnivor
What are the problem facing researcher in any country?
Funding for the research.
How can you differentiate a hardware problem from a software problem?
subuin mo titi ko
Techniques involved in defining the research problem?
s a researcher, you must have often read that defining a problem is the first step in a research process. But, have you ever wondered what is meant by 'defining a problem'. Well, it simply means that the researcher has to lay down certain boundaries within which he/she has to study the problem with a pre-defined objective in mind.Defining a problem is a herculean task, and this must be done intelligently to avoid confusions that arise in the research operation. Try to follow the below steps systematically to best define a problem:i. State the problem in a general way:First state the problem in general terms with respect to some practical, scientific or intellectual interest. For this, the researcher may himself read the concerned subject matter thoroughly or take the help of the subject expert. Often, the guide states the problem in general terms; it depends on the researcher if he/she wants to narrow it down to operational terms. The problem stated should also be checked for ambiguity and feasibility.ii. Understand the nature of the problem:The next step is to understand the nature and origin of the problem. The researcher needs to discuss the problem with those related to the subject matter in order to clearly understand the origin of the problem, its nature, objectives, and the environment in which the problem is to be studied.iii. Survey the available literature:All available literature including relevant theories, reports, records, and other relevant literature on the problem needs to be reviewed and examined. This would help the researcher to identify the data available, the techniques that might be used, types of difficulties that may be encountered during the study, possible analytical shortcomings, and even new methods of approach to the present problem.iv. Go for discussions for developing ideas:The researcher may discuss the problem with his/her colleagues and others related to the concerned subject. This helps the researcher to generate new ideas, identify different aspects on the problem, gain suggestions and advices from others, and sharpen his focus on certain aspects within the field. However, discussions should not be limited to the problem only, but should also be related to the general approach to the problem, techniques that might be used, possible solutions, etc.v. Rephrase the research problem into a working proposition:Finally, the researcher must rephrase the problem into a working proposition. Rephrasing the problem means putting the problem in specific terms that is feasible and may help in the development of working hypotheses. Once the researcher has gone through the above steps systematically, it is easy to rephrase the problem into analytical and operational terms.
When does a researcher generally form a hypothesis and make predictions?
when he gets problem
What to do when things have gone worst between me n my girlfriend?
If you don't deal with the problem, the issue will continue. So first identify the problem, and find a lasting solution to it.
Which phase of dmaic will you identify the root of the problem?
During which phase of DMAIC will you identify the root cause of the problem?
Is it true that if it takes more than a few experiments to find the answer to a particular problem it means that the scientist has failed and is not a very good researcher?
It is not true that if a scientists fails to find a definite answer to experiments that they are a bad researcher. The problem could be very complicated.
What are the techniques involved in defining a problem?
TECHNIQUES INVOLVED IN DEFINING A PROBLEM:As a researcher, you must have often read that defining a problem is the first step in a research process. But, haveyou ever wondered what is meant by ‘defining a problem’. Well, it simply means that the researcher has to laydown certain boundaries within which he/she has to study the problem with a pre-defined objective in mind.Defining a problem is a herculean task, and this must be done intelligently to avoid confusions that arise in theresearch operation. Try to follow the below steps systematically to best define a problem:i. State the problem in a general way:First state the problem in general terms with respect to some practical, scientific or intellectual interest. For this, theresearcher may himself read the concerned subject matter thoroughly or take the help of the subject expert. Often,the guide states the problem in general terms; it depends on the researcher if he/she wants to narrow it down tooperational terms. The problem stated should also be checked for ambiguity and feasibility.ii.Understand the nature of the problem:The next step is to understand the nature and origin of the problem. The researcher needs to discuss the problem withthose related to the subject matter in order to clearly understand the origin of the problem, its nature, objectives,and the environment in which the problem is to be studied.iii. Survey the available literature:All available literature including relevant theories, reports, records, and other relevant literature on the problem needsto be reviewed and examined. This would help the researcher to identify the data available, the techniques that mightbe used, types of difficulties that may be encountered during the study, possible analytical shortcomings, and even newmethods of approach to the present problem.iv. Go for discussions for developing ideas:The researcher may discuss the problem with his/her colleagues and others related to the concerned subject. Thishelps the researcher to generate new ideas, identify different aspects on the problem, gain suggestions and advicesfrom others, and sharpen his focus on certain aspects within the field. However, discussions should not be limited tothe problem only, but should also be related to the general approach to the problem, techniques that might be used,possible solutions, etc.v. Rephrase the research problem into a working proposition:Finally, the researcher must rephrase the problem into a working proposition. Rephrasing the problem means putting theproblem in specific terms that is feasible and may help in the development of working hypotheses. Once theresearcher has gone through the above steps systematically, it is easy to rephrase the problem into analytical andoperational terms.
