They didn't.
What you are speaking of is called social Darwinism and it should have been called social Spencerism because Herbert Spencer mistakenly applied the theory of evolution by natural selection to social theory and thus committed the naturalistic fallacy and Lamarckism at the same time.
Just because something is natural does not mean it is good and how this " superior " social class viewed hereditary was straight out of Lamarck.
Darwin wanted nothing to do with this mistaken notion.
The history of science is the study of the historical development of science and scientific.
He has been called the " Charles Darwin " of the 20th century, but his greatest interest was in abiogenesis and that rather from a dialectal materialistic perspective.
One was Darwin's theory was the process of evolution by natural selection and the second one was Lyell's theory was that animals can adapt and change their traits to fit the environment.
Scientists don't use evolution directly to classify species. The modern taxonomic system predates the theory of evolution by over a century (Linneus, one of the more influential people involved in its widespread acceptance wrote Systema Natureae in 1735 while Darwin didn't come along with The origin of Speciesuntil 1859).They group species by sets of shared characteristics. However, organisms evolving from shared ancestors also share many of the characteristics from that common ancestor so it ends up correlating with evolutionary paths very closely.It's probably more accurate to say that evolutionists use taxonomy than the other way around.
Please understand that EVOLUTION is not a true theory.Every SINGLE assumption and rule that evolution has put forward has been proved wrong ,not only by paleontological evidence ,but also by evidence from all divisions of science. JUST think of it this way: A changes to z very slowly through time .ok.But then,A has to pass through all 25 letters to get to Z.This means that WE SHOULD FIND More fossils of these INTERMEDIATE species rather than the complete organisms that have @evolved@.But in fact none exists. Evolution is just a rumor that has been proven wrong but has been dragged out unnecessarily to the 21st century.
Bhagbanprakash. has written: '21st century' -- subject(s): Economic development, Social evolution, Social change
The human civilization in the first century was a primitive race. Tools and skills were at the beginning of evolution. In comparison to today, development and progression of tools and skills were much slower back then.
trace the development of english drama from 10th century to 16th century
Creation in the 21st Century - 2004 The Magic Can of Evolution was released on: USA: 22 October 2010
Charles Darwin in the 19th century.
The 18 century
14th century
The guitar originated in Spain in the 15th century. Its historical significance lies in its evolution as a popular musical instrument used in various genres of music worldwide, contributing to the development of music and culture.
dasdsds
The first step in the development of organum was?
Considered the most important orthopedic development in the twentieth century, arthroscopic surgery is widely used.
The guitar originated in Spain in the 15th century. Its evolution has been influenced by various cultures and musicians over the centuries, leading to the development of different styles and designs. This has shaped the instrument we know today by expanding its range, improving its playability, and creating a wide variety of sounds and techniques.