Theories are formulated using the scientific method of research where a hypothesis is created, tested and the results are examined. If the hypothesis can explain the data, make successful predictions and is not contradicted by reliable evidence we would call it a theory. For example, Newton's theory of gravity was formed to explain what the relationship between mass, distance and gravity is; after much testing and examination, it was found to hold true (at least for speeds not approaching that of light).
Laws are mathematical relationships derived from theories. For example, Newton's law of gravity expresses Newton's theory of gravity in a formula using the required variables as Fg = GMm/d2.
There is replicatable data that runs counter to the laws/theories.
Like every other scientists, Greeks based their theories on observations, experiments, proofs, evidence and more.
Scientific theories enable scientists to make accurate predictions about new situations.
re do it many times
pure scientists
Scientists make use of theories in order to gain further scientific knowledge
There are many philosophers and scientists who "He" could refer to.
Most scientists avoid calling scientific theories "laws" because theories are supported by evidence and may be revised or refined based on new findings. Laws, on the other hand, are typically descriptive statements of observed phenomena that hold true under specific conditions and are not subject to change. Using the term "theory" emphasizes the provisional and dynamic nature of scientific understanding.
Laws have been proven, theories have not
all theories don't become laws
Yes, because half of all scientists are liars and should be able to use your brain and question their laws and/or theories.
The scientific method and the protocols of science were made by many scientists over time. Most of these "rules" came from the "fathers" of science.Now if you mean scientific laws, they are an innate part of nature, and scientists only discover those. It all starts with an educated guess (hypothesis). From there, you can form theories about how things work based on the evidence obtained by experimentation. If the theories withstand the test of time, then they are considered scientific law.
There is replicatable data that runs counter to the laws/theories.
Laws in science are theories that can be proved in a repeatable experiment (i.e. evolution is not repeatable, thus it is a theory.) However, there is no formal board of scientists that rule if something is a law or not.
Theories and laws serve different purposes in science. Theories are explanations that integrate and explain data from various observations, while laws are concise descriptions of a particular phenomenon. Theories are more comprehensive and can be modified or refined with new evidence, whereas laws are typically more general and do not change. Thus, theories are not elevated to laws but can support them.
the laws of motion
Laws can only be changed if enough evidence has been given to disprove the law and place another law in its place. Theories change all the time. Theories are basically a question that scientist try to answer. Theories are just an idea that scientists give as an explanation to a question but they are not sure yet