Research results are published in scientific journals. If some scientist wishes to replicate the work of another scientist, he or she reads about it in the published report, and then does what the written description says.
how might a fossil affect the work of scientists
Scientists do that because they are skeptical about other scientists' work. They do not usually believe what other scientists have concluded, so other scientists come up with a hypothesis (or simply state a question) as to contradict, or theorize why another scientists' work and conclusions are wrong. In short: Scientists are skeptical and do not believe what another scientist has come up with as a conclusion.
based on observation of what is wrong with the work of other scientists
So other scientists can repeat them
neonatal nurses
Other scientists
I will replicate the statue of liberty for my project.
how might a fossil affect the work of scientists
yes
Scientists do that because they are skeptical about other scientists' work. They do not usually believe what other scientists have concluded, so other scientists come up with a hypothesis (or simply state a question) as to contradict, or theorize why another scientists' work and conclusions are wrong. In short: Scientists are skeptical and do not believe what another scientist has come up with as a conclusion.
to share their data
based on observation of what is wrong with the work of other scientists
Peer review
communicating
peer review (:
I think in the labaratory where other scientists work but mabey in a special other room
yeah had lots of them.