By testing them.
According to the scientific method they do it because the first time they try the experiment, the results might be wrong. In the case of which many experiments are being tested multiple times, scientists want to make sure that there results are correctly answered.
After observational evidence is published to support a hypothesis, particularly one that challenges conventional wisdom, scientists begin to analyze the evidence to see if there is some error. This analysis can take weeks to months; if other scientists try to replicate the experiment, it can take a few years. If the initial observations -- and the conclusions that can be drawn from them -- are shown to be correct, scientists (sometimes grudgingly) cease to refer to the original idea as a hypothesis and start to call it a theory.
Scientists examine all of the data and try to see what conclusion will fit all of them.
Some scientists are people that explore the world and try to tell us about the planet but we don't understand!
No, historically many scientists have been strongly religious; nowadays more scientists tend to be atheists than the general public and it also seems likely that the more senior the scientist, the more likely they are to be atheist. There are scientists who are religious and try to contort science to prove their religious beliefs. On the other hand, there are scientists who are religious and understand perfectly that religion and science are completely separate and distinct. In the world of science, those within it are all unique individuals, just like the rest of the world. So one way of believing or thinking anything can't be assumed.
Maybe you should try asking questions with detail and acceptable spelling and grammar.
You should try to answer any questions that haven't already been answered in the rest of the paper.
According to the scientific method they do it because the first time they try the experiment, the results might be wrong. In the case of which many experiments are being tested multiple times, scientists want to make sure that there results are correctly answered.
people try them out and get paied for it
Scientists often do seek answers to questions they find intriguing or important, but this is not a strict rule. Sometimes, scientists may investigate questions posed by others or pursue research based on established theories or priorities in their field. The pursuit of knowledge is a complex and multifaceted endeavor, driven by curiosity, practical considerations, societal needs, and the existing body of scientific knowledge. .
To answer a specific question, scientist form a hypothesis. If the hypothesis cannot be testable or answered, they'll give you a prediction of what will most likely happen from the results of the hypothesis.
because it will help us understand each other more and hopefully answer some unanswered questions, like how the brain actually works.
you run, you exersize, and you can play sports. try the tredmile!
After observational evidence is published to support a hypothesis, particularly one that challenges conventional wisdom, scientists begin to analyze the evidence to see if there is some error. This analysis can take weeks to months; if other scientists try to replicate the experiment, it can take a few years. If the initial observations -- and the conclusions that can be drawn from them -- are shown to be correct, scientists (sometimes grudgingly) cease to refer to the original idea as a hypothesis and start to call it a theory.
Scientists examine all of the data and try to see what conclusion will fit all of them.
5HTP has not been thoroughly tested. I don't think that insurance will cover it. So, best try SSRIs first.
It means... Try-out: You get tested about your personality by someone and they pick someone with the personality the person is looking for.