Lets start out with calculating an area where the measurements of the length and width both have an error involved. A is the length of one side with an error of 'a'. B is the length of the other side with an error of 'b'.
Ordinarily when we talk about errors we always say +/- but I don't have such a symbol on my keyboard and typing +/- all the time is labourious so I'm just going to use + and hope you do the conversions yourself (ok).
When calculating the area we multiply length time width, in our case A*B. When using errors however we must use (A+a)*(B+b). Multiplying this out we get
AB +Ab+Ba+ab.
AB is the area without errors considered. Ab+Ba+ab is the error. Consider it as a collection of areas (which it is in this case but the conceptualization can be applied to other problems of these dimensions) with the A side having a short bit at its terminal end of length a, the B side having a short bit at its terminal end of length b. The short bit at the end of side A makes a thin slice along the width of side B (of area Ba), and the short bit at the end of side B makes a thin slice along the width of side A (of area Ab). Also at the common end of slice Ba and Ab is a little rectangle (of area ab). Drawing a picture at this point may prove helpful.
Now if the error involved in one of these measurements is so close to zero that we can comfortably ignore it then the equation of the area becomes:
AB + Ab if a<<<<0. or AB + Ba if b<<<<0
substitute 0 (for a and then for b) into the equation above and see what you get.
Usually when we deal with errors we only consider those terms that involve the greatest source of error, as the error produced by this term will usually 'include' any and all errors produce by minor errors. Remember errors are +/- factors. If the value of 'a' (the % error involved in the measurement of A) is 90%, and the value of 'b' is 1%. Then (for example if A=B=100) The Ba error would be +/- 90 while the Ab error would be +/-1. Only in two very rare possibilities would these two errors be cumulative +91 or -91. In most cases the +1 error would 'rattle around inside' the boundaries of the +90 error.
Lets consider the formula for a volume: LWD, Length times width times depth, and use the notation (A+a),(B+b),(C+c) for the measurements of the independent dimensions and their associated errors. Multiplying these measurements out using the formula for volume gives:
(AB+Ab+aB+ab) (C+c) -> ABC +ABc + AbC + Abc + aBC + aBc + abC + abc
ABC is the major volume without errors considered.
ABc, aBC, AbC are volumes over three of the surfaces (of areas AB, BC, and AC) with a thin depth of c,a and b respectively.
Abc, aBc, and abC are volumes along the three edges of the (rectangular cube) of areas bc, ac, and ab of lengths A,B and C respectively.
abc is a little rectangual cube at the terminal ends of the above mentioned edge volumes. Again a drawing might be helpful at this point.
Now if only one error is significent (lets say a) then we only consider the error terms in which 'a' is the only error. (inclusion of other errors makes the term insignificant). In this case that would be aBC. So the formula for volume would be
ABC +/- aBC
If for a moment we consider two of the errors to be equally significant (lets say a and b) then the formula and error would be
ABC +/- aBC+AbC
where any term involving c or a and b together are ignored.
If for a moment we consider all errors to be equally significant then the formula and error would be.
ABC +/- aBC+AbC+ABc
If in addition we consider the volume to be a perfect cube then we can substitute 'x' for A,B, and C and e for a,b, and c.
x3 +/- 3x2 e
This error would be the three surfaces areas of the common error depth. The three edge error volumes and the tiny error cube are being ignored as their volumes are dependent on two and three errors combined which are tiny values squared and cube which makes them insignificant indeed.
If you know calculus the error is just the 1st derivative of the employed formula with only the major term employed for the error. The argument and derivation is actually the same as that given above.
Yes - there are equal values of nitrogen (4) and hydrogen (12) on both sides of this equation, and all molecular formulas are in empirical form.
Constant variables are constant, they do not change. Derived variables are not constant. They are determined by the other values in the equation.
Constant : these refers to values which do not change. they have the same value throughout the process. Like "1" is a constant value it will never change 1 will always remain 1. i.e.1=1 Varaibles= these refers to those quantities or values which change.for eg. if in a mathematical equation we have "X" variable. Now "X" can have number of values X =2 or X= 3 or X=10000 so they are called variables because their values change.
The condition for constructive interference in thin filmis,m = 0,1,2,....From equation (1) putting the value of t in the above equation we get,since n = 1 for air filmorFor first bright ring, m = 0For second bright ring, m = 1For third bright ring, m = 2Similarly, for Nth bright ring,m = N - 1Radius for dark ringThe condition for destructive interference in thin filmis,2tn = mλ m = 0,1,2,....By putting the value of t, we get,For air n = 1For i.e. point of contact.
what are nutritional values of poinsettia?
The equation isn't quite clear - some symbols get lost in the questions. In any case, you can solve the equation for "y", then replace some values of "x" and use the equation to calculate the corresponding values for "y".
To calculate the area between the x-axis and a line (which may be straight or curved), between two values of x, you first need to find the equation of the line. You then integrate the equation between the limits (the two values of x.
To calculate the pI (isoelectric point) of an amino acid, you can use the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation. This equation takes into account the pKa values of the amino and carboxyl groups in the amino acid. By finding the average of the pKa values, you can determine the pI value.
It might be easier to calculate using numeric values directly if the equation is really simple.
I would set up a table of values and calculate several of the values of the variables (I would try to calculate the "interesting" values setting one to zero and calculating the other(s), guessing at a maximum or minimum value etc. Then I would plot the values on graph paper.
Given a value for the variable x, you find (calculate) the corresponding value of y. These (x, y) pairs are part of the table. You cannot complete the table because there are infinitely many possible values of x.
The electronegativity equation used to calculate the difference in electronegativity between two atoms in a chemical bond is the absolute difference between the electronegativity values of the two atoms. This is represented as A - B, where A and B are the electronegativity values of the two atoms.
You convert the equation to the form: ax2 + bx + c = 0, replace the numeric values (a, b, c) in the quadratic formula, and calculate.
To calculate the rate constant from experimental data, you can use the rate equation for the reaction and plug in the values of the concentrations of reactants and the rate of reaction. By rearranging the equation and solving for the rate constant, you can determine its value.
The kinematics equation for distance is: distance initial velocity time 0.5 acceleration time2. This equation is used to calculate the displacement of an object in motion by plugging in the values of initial velocity, time, and acceleration to find the total distance traveled by the object.
an equation that's true for all values is an identity.
Find values for the variable that satisfy the equation, that is if you replace those values for the variable into the original equation, the equation becomes a true statement.