Scientific hypothesis can be understand by scientific approach (using scientific methods & formulae etc)
Nonscientific hypothesis is based on assumptions only.
A scientific fact is a controlled, repeatable and/or rigorously verified observation.A scientific law is a statement of an observed regularity among facts, often expressible as a simple mathematical relationship.Source: http://ola4.aacc.edu/jsfreeman/TheoryandLaw.htm
Scientific inquiry is a process of developing an explanation of a question in the natural world (or universe) by testing, investigating and collecting data that will either support or refute your original idea of what's going on. A non-scientific inquiry is one that does not use a systematic collection of evidence or one that tries to find answers to questions about things other than the natural world/universe, such as beliefs. "Is Enceladus a moon of Saturn?" is a scientific enquiry. "Did Jesus believe in Judaism?" is an nonscientific enquiry.
Distinguishing between observations and inferences is crucial for scientists because observations are direct, measurable facts, while inferences are interpretations or conclusions drawn from those facts. This distinction helps ensure that hypotheses are grounded in objective evidence rather than subjective assumptions, reducing bias and enhancing the reliability of scientific research. Clear differentiation fosters critical thinking and allows for more accurate testing and validation of hypotheses, ultimately advancing scientific knowledge.
A method that claims to be scientific involves the use of clear procedures which not only show how the results were achieved, but also clear enough for other researchers to attempt to repeat them and must also have empirical relevance to the world. Empirical relevance involves showing that statements, explanation etc. which are used or derived from this approach can be verified of checked out. A scientific method should be objective and not biased and should not rely on hearsay on unsubstantiated facts. A nonscientific method is not systematic and do not have principles in place that should be adhered to. Tshegofatso Rampatla
Distinguish_between_principles_guidlines_and_standard
Scientific questions are based on observable evidence and can be tested through research and experimentation, leading to objective conclusions. Nonscientific questions are often subjective, speculative, or based on personal beliefs, and do not follow the systematic methods of the scientific process.
Hypotheses that explain biodiversity focus on the variety of species and ecosystems that exist today, often exploring factors like evolutionary processes and environmental influences. Hypotheses that explain the origin of life are concerned with how life first emerged on Earth, including theories like abiogenesis and panspermia. Essentially, biodiversity hypotheses address the diversity of life forms, while origin of life hypotheses address the initial emergence of life itself.
They are part of the scientific method. The test results confirm or disprove the hypothesis.
They are part of the scientific method. The test results confirm or disprove the hypothesis.
how can you distinguish between them
A male mammal has a seminal vesicles, prostate gland and penis. A femal mammal has a uterus, oviducts, cervix, vagina and mammary glands. The gonadal rudiment has 2 normal options the opposite of other rudiments, for example a lung rudiment can become only a lung. If the Y chromosome is absented then the undifferentiated human gonads will be a female. The appearances of typical males and females do not allow us to differentiate between these hypotheses. But some scientists have been able to differentiate between these two hypotheses by observing certain unusual situations.
One way to distinguish between a pseudoscientific explanation and a scientific explanation is to look at whether the explanation is based on evidence that can be tested and verified through rigorous experimentation and observation. Scientific explanations rely on empirical evidence and follow the principles of the scientific method, while pseudoscientific explanations often lack empirical evidence and rely on anecdotal or unverifiable claims.
Hypothesis is singular, while Hypotheses is the plural of Hypothesis.
The key difference between the scientific method and the scientific process is that the scientific method refers to a specific set of steps used to conduct experiments and make observations in a systematic way, while the scientific process is a broader term that encompasses all the activities involved in scientific research, including forming hypotheses, collecting data, analyzing results, and drawing conclusions.
distinguish between book keeping and accounting
Test is an assessment intended to measure the respondents' knowledge or other abilities.Experiment is the step in the scientific method that arbitrates between competing models or hypotheses.
A scientific fact is a controlled, repeatable and/or rigorously verified observation.A scientific law is a statement of an observed regularity among facts, often expressible as a simple mathematical relationship.Source: http://ola4.aacc.edu/jsfreeman/TheoryandLaw.htm