Look at who the source is and examine if they have the education or background to be accurate . See if you can find the same data from a second source. Government, university, and research will give citations they used and you can go to those to check for accuracy. I wouldn't use a source that is vague or from a questionable reference.
The things that need to be considered when assessing information for clarity, accuracy, currency and relevance are:Is the format or medium of the information useful to your purpose? Is the information from a primary or secondary source? Is the information comprehensive enough for your needs?
The accuracy to which you can take into account the mass of the spring, and the accuracy and consistency of spring tension data inherently limit the accuracy of an inertial balance.
Accuracy in Academia was created in 1985.
Scientists use infrared images to examine small crystals.
Analysis
audit
Yes, the motivation behind a source can affect its accuracy. If a source has a biased or ulterior motive, it may present information in a misleading or one-sided manner to fit its agenda. It's important to critically evaluate the credibility and reliability of a source before trusting its accuracy.
When it comes to the reliability of a secondary source you need to document your use of this source. You also need to not have an over-reliance on a secondary source.
free response
The authority of the author to write about the subject -Apex
free response
A personal website
expertise and accuracy
Popular science can be a reliable source of information, but it is important to critically evaluate the credibility of the source and the accuracy of the information presented.
Accuracy is precision, the condition of being exact or correct, or freedom from mistakes or errors. Sentence: He shot the arrow with good accuracy and hit the target in the center. Source: Dictionary.com. I tried to paraphrase.
The age of a source does not determine its reliability. Instead, the credibility of a source depends on factors such as accuracy, authority, and relevance to the topic being discussed.
external critisism