P1v1=p2v2
One example of scientific law, is The Law Of Gravity.
When one is used before a noun, it is an adjective.Examples:This is one sentence with the adjective form.This is one example of using the word.
"I was mad at no one in particular."
A scientific law is fundamental, unquestionable and is proven beyond a doubt. Such laws occur in forces like gravitational pull.A scientific theory comprises a collection of concepts including abstractions of observable phenomena expressed as quantifiable properties, together with rules (scientific laws) that express relationships between observations of such concepts. A scientific theory is constructed to conform to available empirical data about such observations, and is put forth as a principle or body of principles for explaining a class of phenomena.A scientific theory is a type of deductive theory, in that its content (i.e. empirical data) could be expressed within some formal system of logic whose elementary rules (i.e. scientific laws) are taken as axioms. In a deductive theory, any sentence which is a logical consequence is of one or more of the axioms is also a sentence of that theory.
One of them is the Law of Segregation or Seperation, but I don't know what the other one is I'll look it up on my Biology book
Boyle's Law states that the pressure of a gas is inversely proportional to its volume when temperature is held constant. One practical application of Boyle's Law is in breathing: when the diaphragm contracts, the volume of the thoracic cavity increases, leading to a decrease in pressure. This pressure difference causes air to flow into the lungs. Conversely, when the diaphragm relaxes, the volume decreases, increasing pressure and forcing air out of the lungs.
How can I best express my tolerance of your acceptance?
That is private information that no one should know.
, I would like to express one grievance that I have with your product.
To solve Boyle's Law equation for V2, first write the equation as P1V1 = P2V2. Then rearrange it to isolate V2 on one side, dividing both sides by P2 to solve for V2, which will be V2 = (P1 * V1) / P2.
Yes, a sentence has to have at least one independent clause, expressing a complete thought w/o depending on another. This means that a sentence could be made up of only one independent clause. Perhaps it does not express the complete thought you wanted to portray when you were righting the sentence, though, which is why you would then either write a new sentence or add a dependent clause, one that only makes sense with the independent clause.
No. A fragment does not express a complete thought, and could be a very long phrase or clause: "Jumping merrily from tree to tree as they went" is a fragment (object without predicate). A complete sentence might be only one or two words: "Wait." "He jumped." "Where's Waldo?"
offspring get one factor from each parent because of the Law of Segregation.
For the same reason many other languages do; to express different actions or states of being in the same sentence.
Boyle's law is not applicable on liquid because the pressure use of that applied on the liquid is the one to be measured not the liquid itself
A sentence is a group of words that express a complete thought. You may be refering to a gerund phrase.
Law of Dominance