answersLogoWhite

0

Hi, data provides evidence to back up your claim. Without evidence, your claim is not reliable.

User Avatar

Anonymous

5y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General Science

How do scientist prove or disprove these claims?

Scientists prove or disprove claims through the scientific method, which involves formulating hypotheses, conducting experiments, and collecting data. They analyze the results to see if they support or contradict the original claims. Peer review and replication of studies by other researchers are also crucial for validating findings. Ultimately, claims are accepted or rejected based on empirical evidence and reproducibility.


What is a successful outcome for a scientific method?

my gess is analyze data or support a hypothesis probly support Ifk


What is a successful outcome for using a scientific method?

my gess is analyze data or support a hypothesis probly support Ifk


Why is impercial evidence used to support scientific explanations?

Empirical evidence is used to support scientific explanations because it is based on observable and measurable data obtained through experiments and observations. This type of evidence provides a reliable foundation for validating hypotheses and theories, ensuring that scientific claims are grounded in reality rather than speculation. By relying on empirical evidence, scientists can repeat experiments to verify results, fostering objectivity and reproducibility in the scientific process. Ultimately, this strengthens the credibility and acceptance of scientific findings within the broader community.


Are substantiated claims are more willing accepted by the denialist politicians lawyers or the skeptic?

A denials politician will accept claims that are in agreement with his position claiming that the data presented to support them is substantiated. A lawyer can either be for or against supporting a position depending on which side he represents. Thus he examines data with a view towards interpreting it as good or bad depending on the outcome he wishes to achieve. A skeptic will only accept claims made, whether they present themselves as substantiated or not, after examining and evaluating the data supporting them.Many bogus claims - fad diets, get rich schemes, or the presence of human skinned lizard overlords - are presented with serious claims and must be denied by all. A skeptic will support claims made which are accompanied substantiated data. He will however not accept the truthfulness of the data without investigation. The other two will set set low bars for "substantiated" if they wish to support the position or will disavow the data if it suits them.

Related Questions

Is the name for the observations and data on which a scientific explanation can be based?

Yes, the name for the observations and data on which a scientific explanation can be based is called "evidence." In scientific research, evidence is gathered through experiments, observations, and measurements, and it is used to support or refute a hypothesis or theory. This evidence is crucial for validating scientific claims and ensuring that conclusions are grounded in empirical data.


What is the observation in an experiment called?

The observation in an experiment is typically referred to as data. This data is collected and analyzed to draw conclusions and support the experiment's hypotheses or research questions. It is crucial in the scientific method for making evidence-based claims.


When presenting data in my research paper, do I need to cite statistics to support my claims?

Yes, when presenting data in your research paper, it is important to cite statistics to support your claims. This helps to provide credibility to your arguments and allows readers to verify the information you are presenting.


You make full use of when you support your claims with evidence from facts data statistics and observations?

Logos


What does it mean to Analyze Data results in the scientific method?

Analyzing data results in the scientific method involves examining and interpreting the data collected during experiments to draw conclusions about a hypothesis. This process includes using statistical tools to identify patterns, relationships, and trends within the data. Researchers evaluate the significance of their findings and determine whether the results support or refute the original hypothesis, ultimately contributing to the broader understanding of the research question. Effective data analysis is crucial for validating scientific claims and informing future research.


How do scientist prove or disprove these claims?

Scientists prove or disprove claims through the scientific method, which involves formulating hypotheses, conducting experiments, and collecting data. They analyze the results to see if they support or contradict the original claims. Peer review and replication of studies by other researchers are also crucial for validating findings. Ultimately, claims are accepted or rejected based on empirical evidence and reproducibility.


What is a successful outcome for a scientific method?

my gess is analyze data or support a hypothesis probly support Ifk


Is a scientific hypothesis accepted if there is no way to demonstrate that it is wrong?

It is accepted if the data support it.


What evidence or proof is provided in the paper to support the claims being made?

The paper provides evidence in the form of data, statistics, experiments, and citations from other research studies to support the claims being made.


What is a successful outcome for using a scientific method?

my gess is analyze data or support a hypothesis probly support Ifk


How are scientific claims evaluated?

Scientific claims are evaluated after a detailed amount of research has been completed and data has been compiled. The information gathered is then studied and a theory is concluded based upon what errors, data entries, faulty reasoning are found.


What is psuedoscience?

Pseudoscience refers to beliefs or practices that claim to be based on scientific methods but lack scientific evidence to support their claims. It often involves using faulty reasoning, unverified theories, or exaggerated claims to create the illusion of scientific credibility. Examples include astrology, homeopathy, and creationism.