0
What else can I help you with?
How does an observation about differ from an inference about that object?
An observation is the changes you see in your experiment. An inference is like drawing a conclusion, I guess...
Why is the ability to adjust conclusions when necessary important to critical thinking?
If you do not use critical thinking, you will believe anything that you read. You need to be able to determine what makes sense and what arguments are made up. It is important to be able to adjust conclusions and expectations so that you remain open-minded to ideas that are new or that differ from what you expect.
How do two kinds of scientific reasoning differ?
objective means that you make decisions and draw conclusions based on evidence, subjective means that personal feelings have entered into a decison or conclusion.
How does the theme differ from the subject?
A subject in literature is a subject such as war, love, or growing old. A theme is an opinion of a character in the work. Readers interpret the theme by analyzing the characters and plot.
How does ethnography differ from ethnology?
How does ethnography differ from ethnology?
How do historian's synthesize evidence to draw conclusions?
They determine how multiple sources differ.
How does the analysis of aggregate data differ from the analysis of individual data in terms of drawing conclusions and making decisions?
Analyzing aggregate data involves looking at overall trends and patterns within a group, while analyzing individual data focuses on specific characteristics of each data point. Drawing conclusions from aggregate data provides a broader perspective, while individual data analysis allows for more detailed insights. When making decisions, aggregate data can inform general strategies, while individual data can help tailor specific actions.
What suggests possible reason for the discrepancy in two conclusions?
The discrepancy in two conclusions could be due to differences in methodology, data sources, assumptions made, or interpretation of results. It is important to critically evaluate these factors to understand why the conclusions may differ. Communication and collaboration among researchers can help identify and address the reasons behind the discrepancy.
How does inductive reasoning differ from deductive reasoning?
Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations or data, while deductive reasoning involves reaching specific conclusions based on general principles or premises. Inductive reasoning is less certain than deductive reasoning because the conclusions are not logically guaranteed by the premises.
What is the defintion of drawing conclusions?
Conclusions" and "inferences" are synonymous terms. That's why the definition of inferences first offered up almost fifty years ago by S.I. Hayakawa in his book Language in Thought and Action fits conclusions as well. Like inferences, conclusions are "statements about the unknown based upon the known" (p.41).
What is the difference between deduction and induction in reasoning and how do they differ in terms of their approach to forming conclusions?
Deduction involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises, using logical reasoning. Induction, on the other hand, involves forming general conclusions based on specific observations or evidence. Deduction starts with a general statement and applies it to specific cases, while induction starts with specific observations and generalizes to form a conclusion.
How does non conventional sources of energy differ from conventional energy sources?
Only by being unusual or used in an unusual way.
Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of children 1939?
the sources differ because they are not all produced at the same time or they are neither by the same authors. some are interviews and some are just articles that were just written after war.
How might Abigail's letters to John differ from other primary sources in the late 18th century?
Abigail's letters to John differ from other primary sources in the late 18th century because they discuss the Continental Congress.
How might Abigail's letters to john differ other primary sources in the late 18th century?
Abigail's letters to John differ from other primary sources in the late 18th century because they discuss the Continental Congress.
How does an observation about differ from an inference about that object?
An observation is the changes you see in your experiment. An inference is like drawing a conclusion, I guess...
How many crew on titanic?
around 900 or so. numbers differ from different sources.
