The experimental method is superior to the correlational method because it allows researchers to establish causation rather than mere association. By manipulating one variable while controlling others, experiments can determine how changes in one factor directly affect another. In contrast, correlational methods can only identify relationships, leaving open the possibility of confounding variables influencing the results. This control and clarity in establishing cause-and-effect relationships make experimental methods more robust for testing hypotheses.
the question is wrongfour prob is better than two prob method as it eliminates the effect of wire imbedance as well as contact resistance
Both procedures are accurate but westergren is easier.
Correlational research typically does not have a control group, as its primary aim is to examine the relationships between variables rather than to establish cause-and-effect relationships. In correlational studies, researchers analyze data to identify patterns or correlations between variables without manipulating any of them. This means that while correlations can indicate associations, they do not provide evidence of causation or the effect of one variable on another.
The Sceptical Chymist by Robert Boyle
Theory
railroads were better transportation than canals
the question is wrongfour prob is better than two prob method as it eliminates the effect of wire imbedance as well as contact resistance
I 4 got
Both procedures are accurate but westergren is easier.
railroads
The strengths of correlation methods is that it allows researchers to examine relationships between two variables. The disadvantage is that it is not valid to assume that the relationship between two variables will apply to all similar variables in general.
it would be charcoal dust that works better than iodine
yes,yes there is
.... Face palm ....
When reliability is concerned then ICCP method is superior but when overhead cost incurred in installation and maintenance is concerned then sacrificing anode method is better than ICCP method. When reliability is concerned then ICCP method is superior but when overhead cost incurred in installation and maintenance is concerned then sacrificing anode method is better than ICCP method.
The osmotic method is better because some solutes and/or solvents are decomposed by the heating required to cause a solution to boil.
An autodialer is a better method than a predictive dialer. This is due to the repetiive task of dialing.