Evolutionary theory can account for the phenomenon of a new species. This is because different species can evolve from a common ancestor.
He might not of if Malthus had not been around but he depended on the works of Lyell.
That is incorrect. Evolution IS important. It is a theory that states that a gradual, slow change happens within a species over a long period of time. Without evolution we might still be apes or something else. So Evolution is very far from being unimportant.
A "theory" is a scenario of what might be.
Gradualism is the theory that evolution occurs slowly and consistently along periods of time. On the other hand, punctuated equilibrium is the theory that evolution does not occurs for long periods of time and then suddenly evolves rapidly in a small short period of time.
A scientist might reject a scientific theory if new empirical evidence contradicts its predictions or underlying principles. For instance, if experimental results consistently show outcomes that the theory cannot explain or predict accurately, this would undermine its validity. Additionally, if a theory fails to account for a significant body of existing data or if a more comprehensive alternative theory emerges, a scientist may deem it necessary to reject the original theory.
to explain the relationship
No, a theory is not a prediction. A theory is a well-supported explanation for a phenomenon based on evidence and research, while a prediction is a statement about what might happen in the future based on the theory.
Evolution
Actually Aristotle wasn't known to contribute to the evolution theory as he didn't agree with most of the theories that were brought up by other philosophers. The only contribution he might have taken apart of was causing conflict between other philosophers and other theory discoveries.
Everyone has a different point of view about evolution, because it is just a theory after all.But there might be some speculation by very spiritual people about this subject.This is an opinionated question though; it is up to youto believe or not believe in evolution.
Darwin might give an explanation based on the theory of natural selection, which suggests that organisms best adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce, passing on their advantageous traits to future generations. This theory forms the core of Darwin's theory of evolution.
Yes. If you have a theory about how things work, it might turn out to be true or it might turn out to be false. The more you know about the subject, the stronger the theory is likely to be, and the likelier it is that the theory will be proven.
He might not of if Malthus had not been around but he depended on the works of Lyell.
Evolution is a scientific theory that is supported by overwhelming evidence from various fields such as paleontology, genetics, and microbiology. The term "theory" in science does not mean a guess, but rather a well-substantiated explanation based on evidence. While evolution is widely accepted among scientists, it is not considered a fact in the same way as established scientific laws because theories are subject to modification based on new evidence.
It is, but so is gravity. In science, 'theory' means 'idea that has been proven over and over and is generally accepted as truth'. It's a pity it doesn't mean the same in everyday language. ^^
Answer:Evolution is a theory put forward by Charles Darwin. Some claim erroneously that he eventually discarded his own theory of evolution. One has to take into consideration that evolution is taking place, but it is the law of evolution which doubted by those who reject evolution. Men today are much taller, fitter and we live longer. Girls become women at an earlier age. This, according to some people, is the law of evolution. This phenomenon is not necessarily part of Darwin's theory. According to some, we did not evolve but were the sons and daughters of God. According to people who believe this, it was He who organized the first man and the first woman from elements that were already available to Him.Another Answer:Most all religious fundamentalists reject evolution and at present a growing number of scientists also differ.Another View:Religious people might take evolutionary theory - or any scientific theory, for that matter - as an affront to themselves, their beliefs, or their gods. This is because scientific explanations are not required to pay hommage to gods without evidence that such gods were involved or even exist, a property of science that might cause religiously-minded people to think of scientific theories as 'atheistic'.
Yes. Theory as in science is a tool to demonstrate the facts of science. A scientific theory is not a hunch, but hypotheses that come to demonstrable testing and peer review. A scientific Theory is fact.