A scientist should confirm that an experiment produces good data by ensuring the experiment is well-designed, with clear hypotheses and controlled variables. They should conduct repeated trials to assess reproducibility and consistency of results. Additionally, statistical analysis can be employed to evaluate the significance and reliability of the data. Lastly, peer review and comparison with existing literature can help validate the findings.
the answer is the scientist designs a scientific inquiry
If an experiment does not confirm his hypothesis, the scientist should report this honestly. Even if the results confirmed the hypothesis, further testing should be done by him or others to gather more data.
scientist analyes their experiment
observe and record data.
she is analyzing data
The scientist or student scientist should review the results. Conclusions should be drawn based on the results. Then, the hypothesis is reviewed to make sure the results confirm the hypothesis; if not, revise the hypothesis and rerun the experiment.
the answer is the scientist designs a scientific inquiry
If an experiment does not confirm his hypothesis, the scientist should report this honestly. Even if the results confirmed the hypothesis, further testing should be done by him or others to gather more data.
scientist analyes their experiment
observe and record data.
observe and record data.
An experiment.
because of the large data simple
she is analyzing data
Well, they could but they shouldn't because they will do something wrong !!! And if it doesnt fit there hypothesis they need to try the experiment again until it fits there hypthesis !!! That would be my solution !!!
Do the experiment again and again to confirm the data is correct If the data is consistent then your hypothesis is wrong and you need to think of a new one that fits the data.
to gather data from data to create an controlled experiment