after it has been tested against a control group with stats
It is important to have controlled variables in a scientific experiment because it is the variable that remains the same it doesn't change. Its a consent & can be measured against.
b
A science experiment is when you don't know the outcome ahead of time, and perform tests to figure out the outcome. A science project is when you know what the results are SUPPOSED to be and then try to duplicate them from theory to reality.
"The evidence for evolution countervails over the arguments against it." THis means that evidence for evolution counteracts the arguments against it.
after it has been tested against a control group with stats
In a scientific experiment, a control is the part of the experiment that remains constant and is used as a baseline to compare against the experimental group. It helps researchers determine the effect of the variable being tested in the experiment.
It is important to have controlled variables in a scientific experiment because it is the variable that remains the same it doesn't change. Its a consent & can be measured against.
There is no scientific evidence or claim that Shakeology can defend against cancer.
The results go against the thinking of society.
There has been no scientific evidence either for or against this question.
This is usually considered evidence against the theory or that the theory needs adjustments. However if similar experiments of similar quality confirm the theory, this experiment may have hidden errors.
b
The participants of the study were monitored closely by the scientists.CCTV cameras are monitored twenty-four hours a day as a deterrent against crime.
A control experiment provides a benchmark against which to compare the results of the main experiment. For example, to know if heating a material changes its resistance, you must be able to compare the results of the heated experiment to a copy in which the material was left unheated.
The Hendershot Generator is a device that claims to generate free energy, but there is no scientific evidence to support its effectiveness. It is considered a hoax by the scientific community.
In Spallanzani's experiment, the experimental group received boiled broth that was then sealed from external contamination. This group did not exhibit the growth of microorganisms, providing evidence against spontaneous generation.