A better explanation might exist.
A better explanation might exist.
A better explanation might exist.
A better explanation might exist.
some information; the data still provide valuable information about the hypothesis
Once a scientific hypothesis is supported by predictable experimental outcomes, it gains credibility and may be considered a valid explanation for the observed phenomena. However, it remains a hypothesis until it has undergone extensive testing and validation by the scientific community. If consistently supported by further experiments and observations, it may contribute to the development of a theory. Nonetheless, hypotheses can still be revised or disproven with new evidence.
A better explanation might exist.
A better explanation might exist.
A better explanation might exist.
A better explanation might exist.
A better explanation might exist.
A better explanation might exist Hypothesis still not considered proven because it is always open to question and to any demonstration of its failure.
some information; the data still provide valuable information about the hypothesis
some information; the data still provide valuable information about the hypothesis
A better explanation might exist Hypothesis still not considered proven because it is always open to question and to any demonstration of its failure.
No. It can never be "proven" true. It's always open to question, and to any demonstration of its failure.But after time goes by, and no evidence has been presented to demonstrate that the hypothesis fails, and the hypothesis has made predictions that were confirmed by experiments designed to test them, then the hypothesis may be elevated to the status of a theory. But it's still waiting to be debunked.Interesting that a theory can be dis-proven in a day, but can't be proven in a thousand years. That's Science.
You need to rethink your hypothesis so it is supported by the data.
The difference is that working hypothesis is that your still working on it but the hypothesis that your not working on it.