0
If the data from an experiment does not support your hypothesis can you revise it or come up with a new one?
Yes. That's the whole point of experiments. If you reckon something will happen, but it doesn't then you have to change your hypothesis. Or your experimental method. Which is why scientists self regulate by publishing claims that other scientists then try to recreate or disprove. Or even just criticise your methods.
If your data doesn't support your hypothesis, but you doggedly stick to it anyway, you've created religion.
What else can I help you with?
True or false If your experiment does not support your hypothesis you should change your data to give support to the hypothesis?
False- The hypothesis is your prediction of what you expect to happen. If the data does not agree with your hypothesis you simply explain why your hypothesis did not come true and possibly investigate variable which would allow your hypothesis to come true.
What does a scientist need to do once an experiment is complete what must a scientist do to determine whether the data support the hypothesis?
They come up with a conclusion to the hypothesis
What hypothesis can you use for a middle school science fair project?
A hypothesis is your best educated guess on what the outcome of the science fair project is going to be. So you would first need to come up with the science experiment that you want to do before you can come up with your hypothesis. Example: if your science project was mixing baking soda and vinegar together to see what type of reaction you will get, your hypothesis is your guess on what is going to happen when you mix the baking soda and vinegar together. So my hypothesis for that experiment of mixing baking soda and vinegar together is that it will foam up and overflow from the container that I mixed them in. If that happens then my hypothesis was correct. So you need to have an experiment in mind before you can make your hypothesis for the experiment.
The process by which scientists formulate a hypothesis gather data by observation and experimentation and come to a conclusion is?
A science experiment.
After the experiment scientist do what?
your answerWell what you have to know FIRST is what they do BEFORE the experiment. What scientist do before an experiment is they observe what they are going to do. Then they come up with an HYPOTHESIS. An HYPOTHESIS is an educated guess. They write what they THINK is going to happen. Then they do their experiment. After they do that, they check their HYPOTHESISand if they guessed wrong, they don't cross the HYPOTHESISout, they learn from their mistakes, so they write what really happened during the experiment. I hope this helped if it did then email me at babybaby12123@yahoo.com
What should be done with the data that does not support the hypothesis?
draw up a new hypothesis based on your research
True or false If your experiment does not support your hypothesis you should change your data to give support to the hypothesis?
False- The hypothesis is your prediction of what you expect to happen. If the data does not agree with your hypothesis you simply explain why your hypothesis did not come true and possibly investigate variable which would allow your hypothesis to come true.
If your experiment does not support your hypothesis you should change your data to give support to the hypothesis. true or false?
False- The hypothesis is your prediction of what you expect to happen. If the data does not agree with your hypothesis you simply explain why your hypothesis did not come true and possibly investigate variable which would allow your hypothesis to come true.
What does a scientist need to do once an experiment is complete what must a scientist do to determine whether the data support the hypothesis?
They come up with a conclusion to the hypothesis
What should you do when your data will not support your hypothesis?
come up with new hypothesis
How do you come up with a hypothesis for a lab?
The lab would be used to test your hypothesis to whether or not you were correct. You would first want to form a hypothesis and then gather data to support or discredit your hypothesis. The hypothesis could be testing anything essentially.
Which steps come before conducting an experiment in the scientific method?
Forming a hypothesis X4
What are the steps in making a valid conclusion?
You first have to come up with a hypothesis. Review the relevant work already completed out there. Design an experiment around to test your hypothesis. Conduct the experiment and analyze the results. Write a summary report. Using the data from the experiment to evaluate the hypothesis in order to draw a valid conclusions.
What hypothesis can you use for a middle school science fair project?
A hypothesis is your best educated guess on what the outcome of the science fair project is going to be. So you would first need to come up with the science experiment that you want to do before you can come up with your hypothesis. Example: if your science project was mixing baking soda and vinegar together to see what type of reaction you will get, your hypothesis is your guess on what is going to happen when you mix the baking soda and vinegar together. So my hypothesis for that experiment of mixing baking soda and vinegar together is that it will foam up and overflow from the container that I mixed them in. If that happens then my hypothesis was correct. So you need to have an experiment in mind before you can make your hypothesis for the experiment.
The process by which scientists formulate a hypothesis gather data by observation and experimentation and come to a conclusion is?
A science experiment.
After the experiment scientist do what?
your answerWell what you have to know FIRST is what they do BEFORE the experiment. What scientist do before an experiment is they observe what they are going to do. Then they come up with an HYPOTHESIS. An HYPOTHESIS is an educated guess. They write what they THINK is going to happen. Then they do their experiment. After they do that, they check their HYPOTHESISand if they guessed wrong, they don't cross the HYPOTHESISout, they learn from their mistakes, so they write what really happened during the experiment. I hope this helped if it did then email me at babybaby12123@yahoo.com
Did Spallanzani's experiment disprove the hypothesis that microorganisms could arise spontaneously from a vital force contained in the air?
Spallanzani's experiment did not completely disprove the hypothesis of spontaneous generation because critics argued that sealing the containers prevented the vital force of air from entering. However, it did provide strong evidence to support the idea that microorganisms do not arise spontaneously but come from other living organisms or pre-existing sources.
