0
If you could magnify a droplet of water hundreds of thousands of times what might you see?
If the water was not absolutely pure and sterile, you'd see organisms living in it - enough magnification and you could examine their cell structure and identify the DNA, etc. Also whatever impurities were in the water - bits of organic waste matter, undissolved minerals, precipitates. Though you wouldn't be able to see the water molecules themselves without a VERY powerful microscope.
What else can I help you with?
Why countries that do not produce acid rain still can suffter from it?
Because the gasses that eventually cause acid rain are everywhere in the atmosphere and clouds. As wind patterns move over the earth, they carry these gasses everywhere they go. The rain falls where it will. The acid rain gasses could come from hundreds or thousands of miles away.
Why do you need a special microscope to see atoms?
Because traditional optics cannot magnify something the size of an angstrom to a level viewable by the human eye. In addition atoms move faster than a human could track.
What kind of fossil is a arrowhead made thousands of year ago?
Arrowheads are not fossils, they were made by the Native Americans to use on the tips of their arrows.
What if you nut in a vacuum?
If you were to ejaculate in a vacuum, the lack of air pressure would prevent the usual dispersal of the fluid. The semen would not experience the same physical properties as it would in a normal environment, potentially leading to it forming a droplet that floats or clumps together. However, the lack of atmosphere would also mean that the biological components of the semen could degrade quickly due to the absence of necessary conditions for preservation. Overall, the process would be significantly different from what occurs in a typical setting.
How long does it take for a CD to decompose?
It could be many hundreds of years for a cd to decompose. Unless they are in a corrosive acidic enviroment. Usable "life" is 217 years for re-writables... Permanents are much longer. Do no throw them in the trash, you can send them in to be recycled. Gather a bunch and send them in. http://www.cdrecyclingcenter.org/
Is this correct- millions of thousands?
No. You could say Hundreds of thousands. The first # must be smaller than the second #.
Why forests should be saved from clearance and destruction?
Because the trees are homes to hundreds of thousands of animals, a tree that could make a floor board for a human could make hundreds of homes for animals
How much does a 1958 Plymouth fury go for?
It depends on the condition. It could be hundreds or many thousands of dollars.
What is the value of 1979 dodge transvan?
The condition will make all the difference. Could be hundreds or thousands of dollars.
How do you make a sentence using magnify?
I really could use something to magnify this print.
Which is correct - 'Hundreds of thousands of people' or 'hundreds and thousands of people'?
Hundreds of thousands of people! Answer hundreds and thousands of people Answer As you can see, both alternatives are used, and probably they are equally correct. I would tend to use "of". You may have heard people say "tens of thousands", and this is correct usage as well. The idea is that "tens" and "hundreds" are ways to give a rough idea of scale. I could say "There are thousands of people in New York City." "Thousands" is not entirely wrong; there are in fact many, many thousands of people there (a thousand thousands for each million). But thousands isn't the best estimate of magnitude. If I say "thousands", I mean a few thousand, maybe even a few more than 10. But if I say "tens of thousands", I mean, perhaps, 30, 40, 50, 60 thousand. Thousands, around the order of magnitude "10". Hundreds and thousands, to my ear, does not convey the same general magnitude of size. Of course, there is nothing even remotely accurate about these estimates, but they help us grasp what the speaker is attempting to convey. Hundreds and thousands means multiples of hundreds (100s) and/or thousands (1000s). But hundreds of thousands (100000s) means multiples of a much bigger number indeed. So both are correct expressions but they convey the idea of quite different sizes of number.
The number of your hundreds plus the number of your thousands is 3 the number of your tens is 7 ties the number of your hundreds the number of your ones is 3 the number of your thousands what naumber?
Could you please complete the words in your question? I am unable to solve a partial question.
How long could a long period comets take to orbit around the Sun?
Possibly hundreds of thousands of years.
If you say hundreds and also thousands what do you say when it comes to a number below 100?
You could say "dozens" for some number between 12 and maybe 48. You could try "scores" for numbers like 10,20,30... And while 'hundreds' or 'thousands' would be menat to imply some large number that you aren't sure of - IE "there are thousands of them" - you might say "there are like 56 of them"
Can tou live in equator?
Personally, I could not. But there are hundreds of thousands of people all around the world, in the countries crossed by the equator, who do.
What is a sentence for the word magnify?
When you use a microscope it will magnify the object you are looking at.Unwanted publicity can magnify the effect of a small political indiscretion.
What is the cost of a break job for Lamborghini?
Well, depending on how much damage you actually do to highly expensive vehicle it could cost you Hundreds to Hundreds of Thousands. Are you trying to break it for insurance purposes?
