answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

true

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Luther Thompson

Lvl 1
8mo ago
True

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: If your prediction is proven incorrect you should still include all your observations in your analysis and discuss why you think your original prediction turned out to be wrong?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General Science

If your prediction is proven incorrect you should still include all your observations in your analysis and discussed why you think your original prediction turned out to be wrong true or false?

True


What is the summary of many experimental results and observations?

No. Observations come first, followed by a hypothesis as to what might be happening. This is then developed into a theory which purports to explain the observations, supporting or rebutting the original hypothesis. Experiments are then used to validate the theory into the realm of fact.


Does the qualitative observations have to be related to what your hypothesis is?

Original Answer:I would tie it back in and show whether it helped to reject/fail to reject your hypothesis.Different Answer:A hypothesis (Informal definition), is basically a question based on anticipated results. The experiment is created to try to prove or disprove that hypothesis. When conducting an experiment, only three results can occur. That is the hypothesis is confirmed, the hypothesis is incorrect, or the results were inconclusive. Of the three possible answer, the third is the most maddening as it could indicate that something is wrong with your experiment.Sometimes the most fascinating discoveries come from observations that are either inconclusive, or disprove a hypothesis.


Which best explains why writers practice making observations?

Observation help them make their writing feel belivevable and real.


What is the next step if the data from an investigation does not support the original hypothesis?

If the data from an investigation does not support the original hypothesis then either:The method of investigation may be flawed and may need to be changed and repeated.The interpretation of the data may be incorrect and should be reviewed.The hypothesis needs to be reevaluated to possibly conform to the data.

Related questions

If your prediction is proven incorrect you should still include all your observations in your analysis and discuss why you think your original prediction turned out to be wrong.?

true


If your prediction is proven incorrect you should still include all your observations in your analysis and discussed why you think your original prediction turned out to be wrong true or false?

True


A prediction about a problem that can be tested?

That would be an hypothesis. After a body of research is completed, and the original prediction is no longer in much doubt, the hypothesis may rise to the status of theory.Yupp! The answer is: a hypothesis


What is the original plural form of analysis?

Analyses


What is an original document containing the observations ideas and conclusions of an individual?

Primary source


Why is your name incorrect on Club Penguin?

If you just joined, then it will be incorrect. I don't know why it is like that, but you original name will come soon.


How does the phylogeny based on molecular analysis compare to the original phylogeny based on anatomical similarities?

Molecular analysis supports much of the original phylogeny and helps to clarify certain relationships.


What is what analysis?

Analysis is when you tell your results to prove or disprove your original guess or hypothesis. Explaining why your results turned out this way.


What is analysis?

Analysis is when you tell your results to prove or disprove your original guess or hypothesis. Explaining why your results turned out this way.


What state's original constitution was considered the most conservative?

Pennsylvania incorrect answer plato users.... :'(


What does a summarie?

A general, shortened explanation of a long description.Historical context of the original text- apexThe name and author of the text being summarized. (Apex)A. Your original questionB. Your predictionD. Your observations/data


Have to be born in the original 48 states to be President?

That's incorrect. A person born in Alaska or Hawaii is also eligible.