Yes, the Enneagram is often considered a pseudoscience because it lacks empirical support and rigorous scientific validation. While it provides a framework for understanding personality types, its claims and categorizations are not based on established psychological research. Critics argue that its insights are more anecdotal and subjective than scientifically grounded. Nonetheless, many people find it a useful tool for personal growth and self-reflection.
Why is phrenology considered a pseudoscience
pseudoscience fake science basically and scince made technology build things
Palm reading is a pseudoscience. Practitioners give vague claims that cannot be substainciated, and use selective reporting of cases where a random statement happened to be true.
No
A pseudoscience technically isn't a science. Pseudosciences are practices/doctrines/disciplines that are similar to the hard sciences but lacks the empirical testing system that defines the hard sciences. Astrology would be an example of a pseudoscience.
Enneagram - 2005 is rated/received certificates of: Netherlands:AL
Enneagram.
Sandra Maitri has written: 'The Spiritual Dimension of the Enneagram' -- subject(s): Enneagram, Spiritual life
Diane Tolomeo has written: 'Biblical characters and the enneagram' -- subject(s): Bible, Biography, Enneagram, Psychology
enneagram
James L. Empereur has written: 'The enneagram and spiritual direction' -- subject(s): Enneagram, Spiritual direction
Jerome P. Wagner has written: 'The enneagram spectrum of personality styles' -- subject(s): Enneagram, Typology (Psychology)
Why is phrenology considered a pseudoscience
Science is not pseudoscience. The former is authentic, the latter is fake.
science is real and pseudoscience is fake
The Enneagram of Personality was developed by Oscar Ichazo and Claudio Naranjo, who combined various psychological traditions to create a system for understanding personality types.
Pseudoscience is a belief which is completely scientific and logical but there is no scientific method for it till now.