Neither properly describes it. All attractions are forces, and there are only four forces in the known universe: gravity, weak nuclear, strong nuclear, and electromagnetic. Magnet attractions are electromagnetic. Both physical forces (that are not gravity) and chemical forces are also classified as electromagnetic forces. So neither physical or chemical properly describes a magnetic force, although classical physics would be more accurate to say than chemical.
its is a physical because it's not reacting with anything
Luster is not a change, it is a characteristic.
Reactivity is not a physical property because it's a characteristic of a chemical element or compound and is involved in chemical process.
No. Iron is naturally magnetic.
The heat conductivity of a substance does not involve changes to its chemistry. Heat conductivity is a physical change and characteristic to a substance.
A physical change
The opposite of a physical characteristic may be a chemical characteristic.
physical property
It is magnetic and black
The flexibility is a physical characteristic of materials.
Dissolution is physical change.
Answer it!
physical change
The color of the light emitted by an element heated within a flame is a physical characteristic, but this particular physical characteristic is itself determined by a chemical characteristic: the distribution of electron energy levels within the element.
Chemical equibrium can involve changes in chemical properties.
Luster is not a change, it is a characteristic.
Compounds are distinguished from each other by their characteristic physical and chemical properties.
A substance that is formed from one type of atoms with a characteristic set of physical and chemical properties is called an element.