0
What else can I help you with?
Are opinions realatede to scientific evidence?
Opinions can be informed by scientific evidence, but they are not inherently the same. While scientific evidence is based on empirical data and rigorous methodologies, opinions are subjective beliefs or interpretations that may or may not align with that evidence. It’s important to differentiate between evidence-based conclusions and personal beliefs, as the latter can be influenced by factors beyond scientific reasoning, such as cultural, emotional, or social considerations.
Is observation the same as hypothesis?
no, hypothesis is sort of the fancy way of saying "guess" or "prediction". Observation is doing an experiment or observing (watching)
How do scientists gather evidence to answer?
Observation, like Tycho Brahe observing the motion of the planets; Experimentation, like Galileo dropping a ball from the tower of Pisa; and interpretation like Einstein's Brownian Motion. These are the ways evidence is gathered and all three can be wrong. Replication, others getting the same answers from repeating the first scientists work is a safeguard but not sure protection. For example the redshift is mis-interpreted to mean the Universe is expanding. The observation is correct but the interpretation is incorrect because of Group Think.
What must be true in order for a hypothersis is scientific or not?
For a hypothesis to be considered scientific, it must be testable and falsifiable, meaning it can be supported or refuted through empirical observation and experimentation. Additionally, it should be based on existing knowledge and allow for predictions to be made. A scientific hypothesis must also be replicable, meaning that other researchers should be able to conduct experiments under the same conditions and obtain similar results.
To what extent can be scientific approach be apply to society?
The scientific approach can be applied to society to a significant extent by utilizing empirical methods to analyze social phenomena, test hypotheses, and draw evidence-based conclusions. This includes the use of quantitative data, experiments, and observational studies to understand human behavior, social structures, and cultural dynamics. However, the complexity of social systems often introduces variables that are difficult to control, making it challenging to achieve the same level of predictability and objectivity found in the natural sciences. Therefore, while the scientific approach provides valuable insights, it must be complemented by qualitative methods and a consideration of ethical implications in social contexts.
What is empirical evidence?
From the Miriam Webster online dictionary empirical means: 1 : originating in or based on observation or experience 2 : relying on experience or observation alone often without due regard for system and theory 3 : capable of being verified or disproved by observation or experiment AND - From a Psychology dictionary : Derived from naturalistic observation of from experimental procedures. Empirical evidence is evidence from observations. From my understanding it can be through naturalistic observation (the in depth observation of a phenomenon in its natural setting) or Experimental (maniplulating an independent variable to observe its effects on a dependant variable). Experimental evidence is much more reliable as naturalistic observations are vulnerable to researcher bias. Empirical evidence is a fancy way of describing facts that can be experienced and tested only through the senses. I suppose you can only compare that to mathematical or logical facts, which depend on reasoning alone (as in the solution of a quadratic equation, for example). Different types of `truth' are discussed by philosophers such as Aristotle, Kant, and Descartes, and the theory of knowledge is sometimes described as `Epistemology.' It's one of the most contentious areas of philosophy, particularly with reference to science and social sciences. epw (B.A. in Philosophy) Scientific evidence is considered empirical when it can be observed by many people and all will agree as to what they observed. An example would be reading a thermometer. No matter who observes the thermometer, it still displays the same temperature. The counterexample to this is physically sensing warmth or coolness. Observer A might sense that a room is warm, while observer B senses that the same room is cool. These observations differ depending on the observer, and are therefore considered subjective. Evidence that is not dependent on the observer (i.e., is objective), that appears the same no matter who observes the evidence, is considered to be empirical evidence. dcs (PhD in Nutrition, research neuroscientist) Empirical evidence is evidence acquired by observation.
What are examples of empirical evidence?
An example of empirical evidence would be, reading a thermometer. No matter who observes it the thermometer still displays the same temperture.
What is the definition of the word empiracal?
The work empiracal does not exist, however the definition of the work empirical:The word empirical denotes information gained by means of observation, experience, or experiment.[1] A central concept in science and the scientific method is that all evidence must be empirical, or empirically based, that is, dependent on evidence or consequences that are observable by the senses. It is usually differentiated from the philosophic usage of empiricism by the use of the adjective "empirical" or the adverb "empirically." "Empirical" refers to the use of working hypotheses that are testable using observation or experiment. In this sense of the word, scientific statements are subject to and derived from our experiences or observations. Empirical data are data that are produced by experiment or observation.The standard positivist view of empirically acquired information has been that observation, experience, and experiment serve as neutral arbiters between competing theories. However, since the 1960s, Thomas Kuhn [2] has promoted the concept that these methods are influenced by prior beliefs and experiences. Consequently it cannot be expected that two scientists when observing, experiencing, or experimenting on the same event will make the same theory-neutral observations. The role of observation as a theory-neutral arbiter may not be possible. Theory-dependence of observation means that, even if there were agreed methods of inference and interpretation, scientists may still disagree on the nature of empirical data.
What is the definition of qualitative knowledge?
There are basically two kinds of observations that scientists make, which are described as qualitative and quantitative. A qualitative observation gives you a general description. For example, a particular substance might be observed to be a liquid, blue in color, in a bottle. Quantitative observation involves measurement. For the same substance you might discover that it weighs 1.098 kg, that it has a temperature of 23o C, and by pouring it into a graduated cylinder, you could determine that it has a volume of 1.3 liters, etc. Qualitative observations don't involve numbers, and quantitative observations do.
What are examples of empire?
An example of empirical evidence would be, reading a thermometer. No matter who observes it the thermometer still displays the same temperture.
What is meant by empirical evidence?
Empirical evidence is an observed phenomenon that appears the same to all observers. In science, evidence is never "proven true," nor is any hypothesis or theory. Scientific information is only considered valid until further evidence is observed that contradicts the hypothesis, theory, or interpretation of previous evidence. Therefore, the concept of proof is not a part of science. It is a valid concept in mathematics and law, but not science in its strictest sense. This reliance on empirical evidence is one of several measures that maintain science as a self-correcting means of studying and learning.
What are the characteristics of observation?
Science is based upon verifiable evidence. By 'evidence' we mean factual observations other observers can see,weigh, count and check for accuracy. Scientific observation is not the same as just 'looking at things'. The characteristics of scientific observations are as follows: 1. It is accurate. 2. It is presice. 3.It is systematic. 4.It is recorded. 5.It is objective. 6.They are made by trained observers. 7.They are made under controlled conditions. 8.It is according to time. This is only a short description of scientific observation. To know more use other websites.
What event may have had the largest effect on political thinkers of the Enlightenment?
The Scientific Revolution had a significant effect on political thinkers of the Enlightenment due to its emphasis on reason, observation, and empirical evidence. This new way of understanding the world influenced Enlightenment thinkers to apply the same principles to politics, advocating for rationalism, individual rights, and democracy.
Is qualitative research same as experimental research?
No, it is not the same. Qualitative research is usually seen as the opposite of quantitative research, of which experimental research is a type of. Qualitative research deals with words, concepts and themes - often answering 'why - questions. It leads to better understanding of life experiences and is holistic in nature. Information is collected through individual or group (focus group) interviews, observation and unstructured observation. Information is analysed through interpretation and the findings is often unique to a specific context in specific time and not supposed to be generalized to other contexts. Quantitative research is based on logical positivism with strict rules. It usually deals with numbers and statistics. The research is supposed to be as objective a possible and the findings to be true in all contexts. Within this family of research experimental research is objective, systematic, controlled investigation to examine probability and causibility among selected independent and dependent variables for the purpose of predicting and controlling.
What is empirical probability?
Empirical and experimental probability are the same thing. They are the outcome of an experiment.
What the Difference between positivism and anti-positivism?
Positivism is a philosophical approach that relies on empirical evidence and scientific methods to understand the world, while anti-positivism criticizes the idea that the social world can be studied using the same methods as the natural sciences. Anti-positivism argues for a more interpretive and qualitative approach to social research, highlighting the importance of subjectivity and context in understanding human behavior.
Simplest empirical formula for allicin?
C6H10OS2. Molecular and empirical are the same for Allicin.
