0
What else can I help you with?
Why do scientists consider every hypothesis valuable A. A hypothesis requires no further investigation if it is proved by the experiment. B. A hypothesis can be used to explain a conclusion even if it?
B. A hypothesis can never be proven. It can be supported, unsupported, or partially supported by the experimental evidence. The experimental data resulting from a tested hypothesis can be used to formulate a new hypothesis.
What is either supported or unsupported by the results for an investigation?
Results from an investigation can either support or contradict a hypothesis based on the evidence gathered. When the findings align with the initial predictions, they provide support, indicating that the hypothesis may be valid. Conversely, if the results are inconsistent with the hypothesis, they suggest that it may be unsupported or require reevaluation. Ultimately, the interpretation of results helps inform future research directions and understanding of the studied phenomenon.
What is a bad hypothesis or a wrong hypothesis?
there is never really a wrong hypothesis because its basically just a guess....
Which type of information does pseudoscience offer as proof?
unsupported claims (apex)
Why are hypothesis never accepted by scientist?
Hypotheses are ideas which are, as yet, unsupported by evidence. As a hypothesis becomes backed up by mathematical formulae and observational data, it may, if it is sound, become a theory. All scientific theories began life as hypotheses, it is merely a case of which hypotheses become theories, and which fall down by the wayside after being discredited or having lacked support.
What is the definition of unsupported hypothesis?
An unsupported hypothesis is a statement that proposes a possible explanation for something but lacks evidence or data to back it up. It is typically not based on any empirical research or logical reasoning, making it unreliable and unproven.
If your prediction turns out false your experiment has been a failure?
No. You can use your experimental observations or do more research to formulate a new hypothesis. A hypothesis that is not supported by the experimental data, it is just simply an unsupported hypothesis.
Why do scientists consider every hypothesis valuable A. A hypothesis requires no further investigation if it is proved by the experiment. B. A hypothesis can be used to explain a conclusion even if it?
B. A hypothesis can never be proven. It can be supported, unsupported, or partially supported by the experimental evidence. The experimental data resulting from a tested hypothesis can be used to formulate a new hypothesis.
What is either supported or unsupported by the results for an investigation?
Results from an investigation can either support or contradict a hypothesis based on the evidence gathered. When the findings align with the initial predictions, they provide support, indicating that the hypothesis may be valid. Conversely, if the results are inconsistent with the hypothesis, they suggest that it may be unsupported or require reevaluation. Ultimately, the interpretation of results helps inform future research directions and understanding of the studied phenomenon.
What is an example of a bad hypothesis?
An example of a bad hypothesis would be: "All birds can fly." This is a bad hypothesis because it is too broad and cannot be easily tested or proven.
What is a bad hypothesis or a wrong hypothesis?
there is never really a wrong hypothesis because its basically just a guess....
Why is a hypothesis that is unsupported by observation rejected by scientists?
Simply put, because there is not enough evidence to support it. "Rejected by scientists" should not be taken to always mean "scientist believe it is impossible" - rather, consistent evidence that support the hypothesis has not been produced.
What was one major weakness of German geologist Wegener's proposal of continental drift that caused the scientific community to raise doubts about the proposal when he first proposed the hypothesis?
unsupported climatic evidence
Why is the hypothesis that black cats cause bad luck not science?
The results of studying the hypothesis are not repeatable and are open to judgement. The hypothesis cannot be tested by controlled experiments.
Why is the hypothesis black cats cause bad luck not science?
The results of studying the hypothesis are not repeatable and are open to judgement. The hypothesis cannot be tested by controlled experiments.
What happens when a hypothesis is unsupported?
Discovering a hypothesis that is not true can be as valuable as finding out that it is true. If the hypothesis is not supported, scientists may repeat the investigation to check for mistakes. Or they may look at the original question in a new way, ask new questions, and form new hypotheses. New questions and hypotheses can lead to new investigations and discoveries. =^-^= Thank you for reading. I hope this helps you. (:
What hypothesis caused by moldy food?
Mouldy food does not cause a "hypothesis" it causes it to taste bad and may give you food poisoning.
