The statement that it is characteristic of a scientific theory is that is well tested is false. A scientific theory is a proposed explanation of certain circumstances in nature.
False. A scientific theory can be disproven if new evidence or observations contradict it. The strength of a scientific theory lies in its ability to withstand rigorous testing and scrutiny; however, it remains open to revision or rejection based on new data. This is a fundamental aspect of the scientific method, which emphasizes continual questioning and testing.
True.
Yes. Scientific theories, hypotheses or more generally conjectures must be testable capable of being proved false.
It is a falsifiable theory about some scientific aspect. Falsifiable means that it must be possible to devise a test whose outcome can prove the hypothesis is false.
A false theory. Break it down to myth: False. And logical: Theory
True. Unlike a scientific theory, a scientific model describes an observed pattern in nature without attempting to explain it.
False. A scientific theory can be disproven if new evidence or observations contradict it. The strength of a scientific theory lies in its ability to withstand rigorous testing and scrutiny; however, it remains open to revision or rejection based on new data. This is a fundamental aspect of the scientific method, which emphasizes continual questioning and testing.
True.
There are many criteria for a scientific theory, it would kill me to list just one, so I'm goint to let you pick from the list. It should be testable. It should be able to be falsified. It's predictions must conform to the observations It should have been repeatedly tested
Yes. Scientific theories, hypotheses or more generally conjectures must be testable capable of being proved false.
False. A scientific theory and a scientific law are not the same thing. A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of an aspect of the natural world, based on extensive evidence and experimentation, while a scientific law is a statement that describes a consistent and observable phenomenon, often expressed mathematically. Theories can evolve and change with new evidence, whereas laws are generally accepted as universally applicable under specific conditions.
A hypothesis must possess capable of being proven false and testable in order to be considered to be scientific.
There are various scientific theories about the origins of matter, but the Big Bang theory is the most widely accepted explanation for the early moments of the universe. If the Big Bang theory were to be proven false, it would require a new, evidence-based theory to explain the creation of matter. However, as of now, the Big Bang theory remains the prevailing scientific understanding of the universe's origins.
It is a falsifiable theory about some scientific aspect. Falsifiable means that it must be possible to devise a test whose outcome can prove the hypothesis is false.
If your issues are on the table, then it would be apparent that empirical evidence would trump theory, if the theory on the table were not proven to be true. If the theory were proven to be true, and the empirical evidence does not agree with the theory, then more experimentation would be necessary to determine the validity of the theory.
An idea that explains something could be called a theory. Good scientific theories are falsifiable which means you could prove it to be false. You can never prove a theory to be true, you can only provide evidence that supports the theory.
A false theory. Break it down to myth: False. And logical: Theory