Short answer: Absolutely not. Natural Selection is cleverly referred to by Richard Dawkins in the title of his famous book as The Blind Watchmaker. It has no goals. Genes have the goal of reproducing, in a sense. It is merely because they happen to have the property of self-replication, and that those that are better at it than others will eventually be more numerous that they seem driven to reproduce. Natural selection, on the other hand, has no future in mind. Every creature that ever lived was at its time, the peak of its section of the evolutionary tree. We can only consider our ancestors "less evolved" because we have the luxury of having been born after them. Humans and other apes share a common ancestor, and all modern apes are just as far evolved from our common ancestor as we are, just in a different direction.
No, evolution is not goal oriented. Evolution is more accurately described as an *effect*, not a cause. Evolution is simply what happens when organisms reproduce with variation.
Micro-evolution is not only a part of macro-evolution, it is the same mechanism as macro-evolution. Macro-evolution includes speciation, as a result of continuing micro-evolution.
Well, theism is the belief in a personal god, and darwinism is darwinian evolution via natural selection, so I imagine theistic Darwinism would be accepting evolution and believing in a personal god at the same time. Christians who accept theistic Darwinism assume that the creation story found in Genesis came about due to macro evolution (i.e. the evolution of one species from another).
something which are goal oriented and u can even mention activities which are not related to work/ college courses, new software / program/ tools
That all humans had evolved from apes into modern humans, research into our own DNA shows that Neanderthals interbred with another branch of apes called cro-magnon man. This resulted in modern humans that we knoe today.
The difference between generic and specific task oriented rubric is that whereas one is holistic, the other one is analytic. The generic oriented rubric is holistic while the specific task oriented is analytic.
Micro-evolution is not only a part of macro-evolution, it is the same mechanism as macro-evolution. Macro-evolution includes speciation, as a result of continuing micro-evolution.
Micro-evolution is not only a part of macro-evolution, it is the same mechanism as macro-evolution. Macro-evolution includes speciation, as a result of continuing micro-evolution.
Macro evolution is just speciation, so you are a form of macro evolution. We and the chimpanzees have a common ancestor that we split from about 6 million years ago. We became Homo sapiensand they became Pan troglodytes.
Evolution is sometimes described as macro-evolution, which is the long-term evolution of an entire new species, and micro-evolution, which is largely to do with less significant evolutionary changes within a species. Many creationists accept the existence of micro-evolution, but say that macro-evolution does not occur.
If you use the micro-macro dichotomy then no Speciation is macro evolution. To be precise, biologists, though many biology texts do not conform, say evolution and speciation.
yes it is a goal oriented process because without having a goal or an aim it cannot run the business
Another word for results oriented is goal oriented. Some other words that could also mean results oriented are goal minded or balanced outcome.
The fossil record
An example of macro-evolution is the appearance of feathers during the evolution of birds from theropod dinosaurs.
reticular
The fossil record
Macro-evolution. Or, more accurately, speciation.