0
Not always really... First it depends on the type of knowledge you're looking for.
If it is general knowledge, it can be gained from life experiences , problems, questions, university, friends... And if it is scientific knowledge, then it may depend on scientific experiments, according to the subject you're managing.
What else can I help you with?
How many experiments are necessary to invalidate a scientific hypothesis?
Only one, providing it is repeatable.One! Replication of the experiment result confirms the result in the scientific community.
What is scientific worth mean?
Scientific value is only a type of thinking from a INTJ's mind. Basically it says that this scientific value matters the most above anything present on universe.it defines everything with scientific explanation.
How can you improve your data accuracy in a lab experiment?
According to the scientific method, any scientific experiment must be done at least 3 times. Also, only one variable can be changed in an experiment (the independent variable). Any more changes will will ruin your dependent variable (your results) and make your data unreliable. If your experiment fails, learn from it, redo the experiment, and change another variable.
How many variables should change in a scientific experiment?
It depends what kind of experiment you do. For some you just need one. For others you may change two variables. In most cases you only change one
Why is it important to report results in scientific journals?
Because if no one did than the new knowledge wouldn't be spread in the scientific community, which would mean that there would be no way for other people to retest whatever the experiment or etc... was, and no progress would be made.
How many experiments are necessary to invalidate a scientific hypothesis?
Only one, providing it is repeatable.One! Replication of the experiment result confirms the result in the scientific community.
What was the shortest experiment in scientific history?
In 1963, physicist Jack H. Hetherington performed an experiment that lasted only 30 minutes to prove a theoretical point. This experiment is considered one of the shortest in scientific history.
Which of these statements is trueBasic scientific knowledge must always come before related technology?
Solving technological problems can produce new scientific knowledge.
How should data be collected and displayed in the scientific method?
The scientific method does not detail how you do an experiment, only the method used in general terms.
Should scientific methods only be applied to science?
No.The scientific method is simply a means to gain reliable knowledge and understanding.
Which area of technology might be associated with this itemMRI?
electromagnetism
What does the notion of positivism refers to?
Positivism is a philosophical stance that emphasizes relying on empirical evidence and scientific methods to understand the world. It suggests that knowledge should be based on observable facts and that only meaningful statements are those that can be empirically verified. Positivism is associated with the idea that the scientific method is the most reliable way to achieve knowledge.
Why must the parameters of a scientific experiment be controlled?
If the parameters are not controlled in a scientific experiment, then one cannot be sure what the variables are. Unless you conduct the experiment in a closed environment with only only one variable, one's results can be confusing and inconclusive.
What is scientific worth mean?
Scientific value is only a type of thinking from a INTJ's mind. Basically it says that this scientific value matters the most above anything present on universe.it defines everything with scientific explanation.
How can you improve your data accuracy in a lab experiment?
According to the scientific method, any scientific experiment must be done at least 3 times. Also, only one variable can be changed in an experiment (the independent variable). Any more changes will will ruin your dependent variable (your results) and make your data unreliable. If your experiment fails, learn from it, redo the experiment, and change another variable.
What do scientists do when the evidence from experiments does not support a scientific theory?
They do the experiment again, double check all their calculations, then they come up with a new theory if it's necessary. That's why there's no such thing as a scientific fact, only scientific theories.
Can scientific inquiry be constructed about any scientific question?
No. There are questions whose possible answers can't be tested by experiment, and are therefore not answerable by scientific means. The classic one, though not the only one by far, is the question of the existence of God.
