No. Evolution is based on empirical, scientific data. It is in no way a merely social philosophical construct. The conjecture was founded upon hard physical evidence, and was built into a solid, robust theory, which now forms the foundation tying all the biological sciences together into one unified whole.
Evolution underpins Biology the way the plate tectonics underlies geology.
Scientific knowledge is based on empirical evidence gathered through scientific experimentation and investigations
scientific observation
empirical approach
After the Scientific Revolution, it became more likely for scientific inquiry to be based on empirical evidence and experimentation rather than solely on philosophical or theological reasoning. The rise of the scientific method encouraged a systematic approach to observation and testing, leading to advancements in various fields such as physics, biology, and chemistry. Additionally, the establishment of scientific societies and the publication of findings in journals fostered collaboration and the sharing of knowledge, promoting a culture of innovation and critical thinking that was less prevalent before the revolution.
Empirical evidence
Scientific questions typically seek answers through empirical observation and experimentation, aiming to explain natural phenomena based on evidence. Philosophical questions, on the other hand, often explore concepts beyond empirical verification, such as the nature of existence, ethics, or consciousness, relying more on reasoning and logic for analysis and discussion.
Positivism is a philosophical approach that emphasizes observable facts and verifiable data as the basis for knowledge. An example of positivism is the use of scientific experiments to test hypotheses and draw conclusions based on empirical evidence.
A belief or hypothesis that lacks empirical evidence or rigorous scientific validation but is widely accepted or followed by a group of individuals.
The philosophical position of positivism was proposed by Auguste Comte in the early 19th century. Comte emphasized the importance of empirical evidence and scientific methods in understanding society and human behavior. He believed that society could be studied and understood in a similar manner to the natural sciences.
Empirical method.
There is no scientific evidence to support the concept of cosmic child abuse in the universe. This idea is typically found in philosophical or speculative discussions rather than in empirical research.
The scientific revolution led to a shift from relying solely on religious and philosophical beliefs to explaining the natural world through empirical observation and experimental evidence. This change in worldview marked the beginning of a more rational and evidence-based approach to understanding the universe.
Scientific knowledge is based on empirical evidence gathered through scientific experimentation and investigations
The Scientific Revolution challenged traditional views and methods of inquiry, leading philosophers to adopt more empirical and evidence-based approaches. This shift influenced philosophers to emphasize observation, experimentation, and reasoning as essential tools for understanding the natural world and shaping philosophical thought.
Empirical adequacy refers to the extent to which a scientific theory or model accurately accounts for and explains the observed empirical data and phenomena. It involves testing the theory against empirical evidence and observations to determine its validity and usefulness in describing the real world. Empirical adequacy is a key criterion for evaluating the scientific credibility of a theory.
Amanda Broderick has written: 'A theoretical & empirical exegesis of the consumer involvement construct'
During the scientific revolution, the scientific method became popular as educated men took an interest in the natural world. These new scientists would test their ideas in order to form a hypothesis or theory.