answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Vangie is black.

Or

A Mustang Has Wheels

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

A Beetle may have four doors.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Represents a logical conclusion based on the two propositions below?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What represents a logical conclusion based on the two propositions A All dobermans are black B Vangie is a doberman?

Vangie is black. (APEX)


What is a logical conclusion based on observation called?

An inference is a conclusion based on logical reasoning.


What is a word for a Logical conclusion based on gathered information?

*Inference*


Logical conclusion based on gathered information?

An educated guess


An inference is the term for a logical conclusion based on?

Context clues


A logical conclusion based on observations is called?

I think I remembered my teacher saying Hypothesis,, --- XxSilvermistxX


What is the best describes deductive reasoning?

It is a logical conclusion based on multiple ideas and theories that are generally assumed to be true


What is a logical explanation of an observation drawn from prior knowledge or experience?

No. A conclusion is based on an experimental result, which attempts to explain how the prior information applies to a given hypothesis.


What is the difference between inference and generalization?

An inference is a logical conclusion based on observations. A generalization is a logical conclusion based on many observations and data. The difference between the two is that inferences deal with specifics pertaining to the experiment being worked on, while generalizations are more "general" and apply more to the idea than the specific experiment.


What might be a logical conclusion as to what Lawrence wants the reader to understand based on this evidence?

the boy died,in part,becuase of a lack of love.


What is the meaning of the word circular reasoning?

Circular reasoning (Latin: circulus in probando, "circle in proving"; also known as 'circular logic') is a logical fallacy in which one begins arguing in the wrong end of a premise. Because all propositions are proved based ultimately on the original assumption including the original assumption no valid conclusion can be reached.Circular reasoning is often of the form: "A is true because B is true; B is true because A is true." Circularity can be difficult to detect if it involves a longer chain of propositions.


Logical reasoning is the use of?

a specific method to come to a conclusion based on facts or assumptions.Logical reasoning entails the use of formal deduction, that is, induction and abduction.