0
What else can I help you with?
Are opinions realatede to scientific evidence?
Opinions can be informed by scientific evidence, but they are not inherently the same. While scientific evidence is based on empirical data and rigorous methodologies, opinions are subjective beliefs or interpretations that may or may not align with that evidence. It’s important to differentiate between evidence-based conclusions and personal beliefs, as the latter can be influenced by factors beyond scientific reasoning, such as cultural, emotional, or social considerations.
Scientific conclusions that are influenced by the opinions or beliefs of the experimenter are what?
They are BIASED. For example, if you are doing a psychology experiment and you are working with: A) Normal people (controls) B) People who have been arrested for physical violence You may be more nervous when testing group B, which may in turn alter your results, when there should not be a difference. This is why there are 'blinded' experiments, in which doctors testing vaccines are given solution A and solution B. They don't know which one is which, but they know that one is the vaccine to be tested, and the other is a placebo (saline - it does 'absolutely nothing', theoretically). Note: if your conclusions from results are influenced by your beliefs or opinions, you need to be very careful - you could either be interpreting the data in a new, novel way that can be very beneficial, or you could be looking at it in a completely incorrect way, and can be criticised heavily for it.
Scientists rely on conclusions based on what?
They rely on there conclusions based on Observations.
Are conclusions reached by an individual based on premises that can be either facts or opinions?
Opinion
Does science ignore opinions?
Opinions are different than scientific hypothesis. A hypthesis is an idea that can (or at least we think can) be tested by the scientific method. Opinions can be anything... personal beliefs, religious ideas, dilusions... really anything and like all people, scientists can have opinions. Opinions really have nothing to do with science and because they are not scientifically testable, some may feel that science is ignoring their opinions.
Are opinions realatede to scientific evidence?
Opinions can be informed by scientific evidence, but they are not inherently the same. While scientific evidence is based on empirical data and rigorous methodologies, opinions are subjective beliefs or interpretations that may or may not align with that evidence. It’s important to differentiate between evidence-based conclusions and personal beliefs, as the latter can be influenced by factors beyond scientific reasoning, such as cultural, emotional, or social considerations.
Scientific conclusions that are influenced by the opinions or beliefs of the experimenter are what?
They are BIASED. For example, if you are doing a psychology experiment and you are working with: A) Normal people (controls) B) People who have been arrested for physical violence You may be more nervous when testing group B, which may in turn alter your results, when there should not be a difference. This is why there are 'blinded' experiments, in which doctors testing vaccines are given solution A and solution B. They don't know which one is which, but they know that one is the vaccine to be tested, and the other is a placebo (saline - it does 'absolutely nothing', theoretically). Note: if your conclusions from results are influenced by your beliefs or opinions, you need to be very careful - you could either be interpreting the data in a new, novel way that can be very beneficial, or you could be looking at it in a completely incorrect way, and can be criticised heavily for it.
Scientists rely on conclusions based on what?
They rely on there conclusions based on Observations.
Scientist must be impartial and not base their conclusions on?
opinions
Are conclusions reached by an individual based on premises that can be either facts or opinions?
Opinion
In the scientific world what are cold hard facts are often termed?
In the scientific world, cold hard facts are often termed "empirical evidence." This type of evidence is based on observation, experimentation, and measurable data, providing a solid foundation for scientific conclusions. Empirical evidence is critical for validating hypotheses and theories, distinguishing scientific claims from opinions or beliefs.
What scientific attitude is being reffered to give truthful opinion?
Objective and evidence-based. This attitude involves forming opinions and conclusions based on actual data and facts rather than personal biases or preconceived notions.
In what ways is scientific knowledge distinct from other forms of knowledge?
Scientific knowledge is distinct from other forms of knowledge in that it is based on empirical evidence, systematic observation, and experimentation. It relies on the scientific method to test hypotheses and theories, leading to reliable and objective conclusions. This sets it apart from other forms of knowledge that may be based on personal beliefs, opinions, or tradition.
Why should scientists base their investigations on observations and data instead of opinions?
Scientists should base their investigations on observations and data because empirical evidence provides a reliable foundation for drawing conclusions and making informed decisions. Opinions can be subjective and influenced by biases, while data is objective and can be independently verified. By relying on measurable and reproducible results, scientists ensure that their findings are grounded in reality, which enhances the credibility and reliability of their work. This approach also fosters a systematic understanding of natural phenomena and promotes progress in scientific knowledge.
Is an ideology a set of facts?
An ideology is not a set of facts, it is a set of opinions. The opinions generally do relate to facts in some way, but these opinions are conclusions based on those facts (or sometimes based on errors or delusions) rather than being factual in themselves.
What is objective approach?
The objective approach involves making observations and collecting data without being influenced by personal feelings, biases, or opinions. It aims to analyze information based on facts and evidence in a neutral and unbiased manner to draw conclusions and make decisions.
A graphic organizer that helps you draw conclusions should function for what purpose?
to help you gather opinions about the topic
