0
What else can I help you with?
Scientists rely on conclusions based on what?
They rely on there conclusions based on Observations.
Scientific conclusions that are influenced by the opinions or beliefs of the experimenter are what?
They are BIASED. For example, if you are doing a psychology experiment and you are working with: A) Normal people (controls) B) People who have been arrested for physical violence You may be more nervous when testing group B, which may in turn alter your results, when there should not be a difference. This is why there are 'blinded' experiments, in which doctors testing vaccines are given solution A and solution B. They don't know which one is which, but they know that one is the vaccine to be tested, and the other is a placebo (saline - it does 'absolutely nothing', theoretically). Note: if your conclusions from results are influenced by your beliefs or opinions, you need to be very careful - you could either be interpreting the data in a new, novel way that can be very beneficial, or you could be looking at it in a completely incorrect way, and can be criticised heavily for it.
Are conclusions reached by an individual based on premises that can be either facts or opinions?
Opinion
Does science ignore opinions?
Opinions are different than scientific hypothesis. A hypthesis is an idea that can (or at least we think can) be tested by the scientific method. Opinions can be anything... personal beliefs, religious ideas, dilusions... really anything and like all people, scientists can have opinions. Opinions really have nothing to do with science and because they are not scientifically testable, some may feel that science is ignoring their opinions.
What does scientific inquiry refer to?
Scientific inquiry refers to that you cannot answer questions based on opinions, values, or judgment. yes but you have to have evidence
Scientists rely on conclusions based on what?
They rely on there conclusions based on Observations.
Scientific conclusions that are influenced by the opinions or beliefs of the experimenter are what?
They are BIASED. For example, if you are doing a psychology experiment and you are working with: A) Normal people (controls) B) People who have been arrested for physical violence You may be more nervous when testing group B, which may in turn alter your results, when there should not be a difference. This is why there are 'blinded' experiments, in which doctors testing vaccines are given solution A and solution B. They don't know which one is which, but they know that one is the vaccine to be tested, and the other is a placebo (saline - it does 'absolutely nothing', theoretically). Note: if your conclusions from results are influenced by your beliefs or opinions, you need to be very careful - you could either be interpreting the data in a new, novel way that can be very beneficial, or you could be looking at it in a completely incorrect way, and can be criticised heavily for it.
Scientist must be impartial and not base their conclusions on?
opinions
Are conclusions reached by an individual based on premises that can be either facts or opinions?
Opinion
What scientific attitude is being reffered to give truthful opinion?
Objective and evidence-based. This attitude involves forming opinions and conclusions based on actual data and facts rather than personal biases or preconceived notions.
What is objective approach?
The objective approach involves making observations and collecting data without being influenced by personal feelings, biases, or opinions. It aims to analyze information based on facts and evidence in a neutral and unbiased manner to draw conclusions and make decisions.
In what ways is scientific knowledge distinct from other forms of knowledge?
Scientific knowledge is distinct from other forms of knowledge in that it is based on empirical evidence, systematic observation, and experimentation. It relies on the scientific method to test hypotheses and theories, leading to reliable and objective conclusions. This sets it apart from other forms of knowledge that may be based on personal beliefs, opinions, or tradition.
Is an ideology a set of facts?
An ideology is not a set of facts, it is a set of opinions. The opinions generally do relate to facts in some way, but these opinions are conclusions based on those facts (or sometimes based on errors or delusions) rather than being factual in themselves.
A graphic organizer that helps you draw conclusions should function for what purpose?
to help you gather opinions about the topic
Does science ignore opinions?
Opinions are different than scientific hypothesis. A hypthesis is an idea that can (or at least we think can) be tested by the scientific method. Opinions can be anything... personal beliefs, religious ideas, dilusions... really anything and like all people, scientists can have opinions. Opinions really have nothing to do with science and because they are not scientifically testable, some may feel that science is ignoring their opinions.
How can you explain that scientific fact should not be distorted by strong feelings or opinions?
Scientific facts are generally based on the facts alone, and outside influences such as strong feelings or opinions are not included as factors.
What is defined as a point of view based on personal beliefs or preferences rather than on scientific evidence?
Subjective point of view is based on personal beliefs or preferences rather than on scientific evidence. It is influenced by individual experiences, feelings, and opinions, leading to a perspective that may not be objective or universally applicable.
