answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

It is called repeated trials.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Scientists do tests more than once to reduce chance of errors called conducting a what?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General Science

What is it called when scientists do their experimental tests more than once so they can reduce the effects of chance?

Scientists encourage other scientists to review and repeat their experiments so that their hypotheses may become Scientists encourage other scientists to review and repeat their experiments so that their hypotheses may become


Scientists do their experimental tests more than once so they can reduce the effects of chance errors.?

Yes? There is always a chance that experimental results happened by chance (something called a Type I error in Statistics which is bad, but over-emphasized). Replications (which are not done often enough) help protect us against such "accidental" effects because reproducing the results by chance is FAR less likely than just getting them once by chance. But reproducing REAL effects should be quite easy. Though if it is the same scientist, in the same lab, it is possible the results can be replicated even when they shouldn't be replicated, not by chance, but because of something systematic (dirty or faulty equipment, poor randomization, experimenter accidently communicates something to the participant, ...).


Why is the attitude of open mindedness important?

Because its so "easy" to be wrong in science ... well, in anything, but non-scientists ignore their own errors.


Which principles of experimental design reduce errors due to chance by repeating an experiment on different subjects under different conditions?

There are no following principles listed in the question.


What is it called when scientist test their experiments more then once to prevent errors?

trial and error

Related questions

What scientific discovery made by chance as opposed to the scientific method?

Scientists do their experimental tests ore than once, so they can reduce the effects of chance errors. this is called conducting _______________.


What do the scientists do their experimental tests more than once so they can reduce the effects of chance errors this is called conducting?

Repeated Trials


When scientisits do their experimental tests more than once so they can reduce the effects of chance errors this is called conducting?

experiment


What is it called when scientists run their experiment more than once to reduce the effects of chance errors?

replicate


What is called when scientists do their experimental tests more than once so they can reduce the effects of chance errors?

== ==


What is it called when scientists do their experimental tests more than once so they can reduce the effects of chance?

Scientists encourage other scientists to review and repeat their experiments so that their hypotheses may become Scientists encourage other scientists to review and repeat their experiments so that their hypotheses may become


Scientists do their experimental test more than once so they can reduce the effects of chance errors This is called?

average result is the result when you do a few times of the same experiment and get a few result then you average it.


Scientists worldwide have agreed to use the metric system to make communication easier and to reduce the chance of errors in correspondence?

Yes true.


What are some of the errors in conducting a research?

they teach dum


Scientists do their experimental tests more than once so they can reduce the effects of chance errors.?

Yes? There is always a chance that experimental results happened by chance (something called a Type I error in Statistics which is bad, but over-emphasized). Replications (which are not done often enough) help protect us against such "accidental" effects because reproducing the results by chance is FAR less likely than just getting them once by chance. But reproducing REAL effects should be quite easy. Though if it is the same scientist, in the same lab, it is possible the results can be replicated even when they shouldn't be replicated, not by chance, but because of something systematic (dirty or faulty equipment, poor randomization, experimenter accidently communicates something to the participant, ...).


Compensating and biased errors in statistics?

These errors occur due to chance. These errors tend to cancel to each other in long run. These errors are random. They are not the results of any prejudice or bais.


Why is it important to align the decimal points when adding?

It reduces the chance of making errors.