Suggest a new hypothesis that could lead a different experiment
because your hypothesis could be right or wrong
An experiment is performed to generate more data. If the data proves to not support the hypothesis the experiment was still useful. You could reproduce your experiment to see if it is performing the way it should. After you have confirmed the experiment is performing correctly you then could devise another experiment to further test your hypothesis or accept the result and revise your hypothesis.
if animals could have swag
It could point to that the hypothesis was wrong.
if u looked it up on the computer look it up on a different website people like this guy/girl is a big jerk /\
the reason why a rejected hypothesis can still be of value to a scientist is because that secific hyothesis may not work for your experiment but it could work for a different experiment/theory
because your hypothesis could be right or wrong
An experiment is performed to generate more data. If the data proves to not support the hypothesis the experiment was still useful. You could reproduce your experiment to see if it is performing the way it should. After you have confirmed the experiment is performing correctly you then could devise another experiment to further test your hypothesis or accept the result and revise your hypothesis.
if animals could have swag
The Scientist gave a very strong Hypothesis on his experiment
if u looked it up on the computer look it up on a different website people like this guy/girl is a big jerk /\
Hypothesis
It could point to that the hypothesis was wrong.
if u looked it up on the computer look it up on a different website people like this guy/girl is a big jerk /\
Yes. A hypothesis is a proposed explanation of some observable event. An experiment is designed to test if the hypothesis is possibly correct. Broadly speaking, there are three possible results of an experiment.The results are inconclusive (for example, the experiment was not designed well or some unplanned event occurred).The hypothesis is disproved (the experiment showed that the hypothesis was not a good explanation).The hypothesis is shown to be possible (a hypothesis can never be proven correct because the results could be caused by some factor not considered in the experiment).
No, it didn't disprove the hypothesis.
Accounting for errors in an experiment will determine the validity and reliability to the experiment. This, in turn, will either support the experimental results by accepting the null hypothesis or to discard the experimental results by rejecting the null hypothesis