answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

generalization

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
4y ago

Umm

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: This is a forming a broad concept based on specific instances inductive reasoning?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How do you formulate a deductive or inductive argument?

Deductive reasoning is reasoning that starts with general principles to form a conclusion about a specific case. To formulate a deductive argument, you should take a general idea or concept, like an ideology or commonly shared moral view and relate it to a more specific subject that links to your side of the argument. Inductive reasoning is the exact opposite; it involves developing a set of specific facts to create a general principle. To formulate an inductive argument, you should take a set of related facts and link them to an overarching moral or concept that supports your argument.


What is the difference between the inductive and deductive method of enquiry?

The deductive method starts with a hypothesis and tests it against observations or evidence, leading to a conclusion. Meanwhile, the inductive method involves making observations, identifying patterns, and forming a general theory or hypothesis. Deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific instances, while inductive reasoning moves from specific instances to general principles.


What was a major concept in Enlightenment thinking?

Logical reasoning was a major concept in Enlightenment thinking.


What is inductive and normative methods?

The inductive method refers to a method whereby a new concept is given and then the learner is expected to apply the concept. The normative method on the other hand provides many examples on how a given concept is to be used.


What was a major concept of the enlightenment thinking?

logical reasoning


What type of reasoning uses the general knowledge of science to make predictions about specific cases?

Deductive reasoning uses general knowledge of science to make predictions about specific cases.It is not a requirement of deductive reasoning that it include overtly scientific data; the concept is that you start with known information. If your starting premises are true, meanings are unambiguous and applicable rules of logic are followed, then the conclusion is true.


Is aconcept observable?

The definition of the word concept fro Princeton is "an abstract or general idea inferred or derived from specific instances". In this sense, a concept only exists in the mind so it is not observable to anyone but yourself, nor is it tangible at all. However a concept in the visual sense such as a concept drawing is obviously observable.


Examples of deductive logic?

This is a concept made more complex than necessary. The two complementary processes of inductive vs. deductive are very simply and easily understood. Consider the number series; 3, 5, 7, 'x', 11, 13, 15, 'y' Simple inspection shows this to be a series of 'odd' numbers, what a mathematician would call 'n+1'. Inductive vs. deductive simply describes the 'type' of reasoning used to determine either 'x' or 'y'. Because it lies 'inside' the other data points, the 'deduction' that 'x'=9 is reached by deductive logic, or, deductive reasoning. We 'deduce' x=9. 'y', on the other hand, lies 'outside' the data, i.e. we don't have a '19' on the 'right' of the 'y' to help us 'deduce' the answer. Much riskier than deductive logic/reasoning, we are forced to use less evidence than we did for the 'x' case. This method is called 'inductive logic/reasoning'. For those who've been exposed to just a little math, this process might seem similar to the dual processes of interpolation and extrapolation...that's because...they are. Identical. Smile, nod and thank those who try to convince you there's 'more to it than THAT!!!'. There isn't. 'Guessing' about anything from 'inside' the data = Deduction/Deductive Reasoning/Deductive Logic = fairly 'safe' procedure = (also) Interpolation. 'Guessing' about anything from 'outside' the data = Induction/Inductive Reasoning/Inductive Logic = slightly riskier procedure = (also) Extrapolation Example of Deductive Logic/Reasoning; Sign directly above two identical unmarked doors, saying 'Customer Restrooms'. Man exits 'left' door. Another man exits 'left' door. Person, with 'hoodie' up, leaves 'left' door. Fourth person, man, exits 'left' door. Deduction? Third person, of unknown gender, exiting 'left' door, was a man. Example of Inductive Logic/Reasoning (same scenario); 'Right' door is the 'ladies'. It really is just that simple.


What is best incorporates the concept of voluntary exchange?

Very few instances of exchange under capitalism are really voluntary.


What is a conceptual rationale?

A conceptual rationale is the underlying logic or reasoning behind a particular concept or idea. It explains why the concept was developed, how it is structured, and what problem or question it aims to address. It provides a theoretical basis for understanding and justifying the concept's existence or importance.


Will examples make a definition more concrete?

Yes, examples help illustrate how a concept or term is applied in specific scenarios, making the definition clearer and more tangible for the reader. They provide context and help solidify understanding by showcasing real-world instances of the concept in action.


What is nut shell polyinstantiation?

Polyinstantiation in computer science is the concept of type being instantiated into multiple independent instances. It may also indicate, such as in the case of database polyinstantiation, that two different instances have the same name.