Stronger.
Ancedotally normally refers to evidence that is based on less scientific evidence but evidence that appears to back up the stronger scientific evidence. It adds weight to scientific evidence but is not necessarily proven.
Scientific theories grow stronger over time because they are constantly being tested, scrutinized, and refined through rigorous experimentation and observation. As scientists gather more evidence and data, they can either support or challenge existing theories. The process of peer review and replication of experiments helps to ensure the reliability and validity of scientific findings. Over time, as more evidence accumulates and different researchers reach similar conclusions, confidence in the theory increases. This continuous process of testing and refinement allows scientific theories to become more robust and reliable as our understanding of the natural world deepens.
It would become a theory. Then different predictions would need to be made to test other parts of it.
The south pole of one magnet is attracted to the north pole of the other magnet.
The short answer to this is 'nothing'. Here's a longer answer: science is all about applying what's known as the 'scientific method'. We observe something in the world around us and question why that thing may be - this can cover anything, from why water is wet, why things fall, why dinosaurs went extinct - anything at all. We then try to come up with an explanation that seems to fit what we're observing - if our explanation manages to do this, it becomes our theory for this thing. For example, the Big Bang Theory gives us an explanation that fits our observation that the universe is expanding. But we don't leave it at that. We have to test our theory - if we observe the same thing in a different way, does the theory still hold? If the answer is 'yes', the theory becomes stronger and more trusted; if not, the theory becomes weaker - we've confined the area in which it works, and we may have shown that it isn't true at all and needs to be discarded. A theory becomes a law when it has passed a series of these tests and seems to be correct over a wide range of looking at things, and is therefore accepted as being a good description of reality. But this is highly subjective - there's no set number that suddenly turns a theory into a law; it's more how the scientific community as a whole views the theory. This subjectivity can be influenced by many things: age (older theories tended to become called Laws sooner the newer theories), simplicity (an easy-to-understand equation will be come accepted faster than a big, complicated one), or just simply the zeitgeist (If a theory fits easily in with what people just believe to be right, it will get accepted faster). One final example to show that the naming is pretty much subjective: Newton's Laws of Motion, which fitted most observations for a good couple of hundred years, but at the beginning of the 20th century, they were superseded by Einstein's General Theory of Relativity; in this case, the 'Theory' is scientifically stronger than the 'Laws'.
Ancedotally normally refers to evidence that is based on less scientific evidence but evidence that appears to back up the stronger scientific evidence. It adds weight to scientific evidence but is not necessarily proven.
Because the best scientist in the world Ani Miteva solved problems every day and found way to improve the scientific theories.
The principal condition is that the theory must be confirmed by repeated experiments.
Technologies came about because someone used the scientific method to do things better/faster/stronger/more.
it helps the soil by giving it energy which in a scientific way hrlps the bedrock grow larger and become stronger
Scientific theories grow stronger over time because they are constantly being tested, scrutinized, and refined through rigorous experimentation and observation. As scientists gather more evidence and data, they can either support or challenge existing theories. The process of peer review and replication of experiments helps to ensure the reliability and validity of scientific findings. Over time, as more evidence accumulates and different researchers reach similar conclusions, confidence in the theory increases. This continuous process of testing and refinement allows scientific theories to become more robust and reliable as our understanding of the natural world deepens.
Yes (and often are).
yes a crocodile is stronger than a alligator
Galileo used more advanced technology to find stronger observational evidence than Copernicus was ever able to provide.
Galileo used more advanced technology to find stronger observational evidence than Copernicus was ever able to provide.
because some metals have a stronger attraction toward each other, its just a natural occurence. there is no scientific explanation. generally the shinier the metal is, the more likely it will be to attract to another element.
Electromagnets are stronger and weigh far less than permanent magnets.