Well, honey, the conclusions in that article are based primarily on the evidence and data provided. I mean, what else would they be based on, a magic eight ball? It's all about facts and research, not wishful thinking or wild guesses. So, if you want the real deal, just stick to what's been proven and leave the hocus pocus for the movies.
They rely on there conclusions based on Observations.
Scientific conclusions are based on scientific evidence.
To identify statements that contain conclusions, look for assertions that draw a judgment or inference based on evidence or premises presented. Conclusions typically summarize the implications of earlier statements or data, indicating a final decision or opinion. Phrases such as "therefore," "thus," or "consequently" often signal the presence of a conclusion. If a statement presents a belief or decision derived from reasoning, it is likely a conclusion.
they based there conclusion on the evidences
evidence from the text
To effectively synthesize an article, one should read it carefully, identify the main ideas and arguments, and then summarize and analyze the information in their own words. It is important to connect the key points of the article and draw conclusions based on the information presented.
They rely on there conclusions based on observations.
In a graph, conclusions refer to the interpretations and insights drawn from the data presented. They summarize the key findings, trends, or relationships observed in the graph, helping to clarify what the data signifies in the context of the study or analysis. Conclusions can guide decision-making or further research based on the patterns identified in the graphical representation.
They rely on there conclusions based on Observations.
Using facts to infer a solution to a case is often referred to as "deductive reasoning." This method involves drawing logical conclusions based on available evidence and established premises. In legal contexts, it can also be part of "evidence-based reasoning," where conclusions are derived from the analysis of facts presented during investigations or trials.
A newspaper prints an article on a controversial political issue. This article could be considered biased if its author? a: formed logical conclusions based on fact. b: presented statistical information on the issue. c: contacted supporters of only one side d: included information that has not been published before
Draw conclusions based on details from the reading.
Scientific conclusions are based on scientific evidence.
Conclusions are based upon prior research and evidence gathered. In a written work, a conclusion will be preceded or followed by the research upon which that conclusion is based.
Critical thinking skills can help readers draw conclusions by analyzing the evidence presented in essays, identifying patterns or relationships between ideas, and evaluating the logic behind the author's argument. By looking for implicit meanings and considering different perspectives, readers can form well-founded conclusions based on the information provided.
To identify statements that contain conclusions, look for assertions that draw a judgment or inference based on evidence or premises presented. Conclusions typically summarize the implications of earlier statements or data, indicating a final decision or opinion. Phrases such as "therefore," "thus," or "consequently" often signal the presence of a conclusion. If a statement presents a belief or decision derived from reasoning, it is likely a conclusion.
"On the face of the record" refers to an examination of the evidence or documentation that is immediately apparent or visible without needing further investigation or additional context. It implies that the information presented is clear and straightforward, allowing for conclusions to be drawn based on what is explicitly stated. This term is often used in legal contexts to evaluate the merits of a case based solely on the documents and facts presented.