Unquestionable or without doubt; contrast or antonym
Consider the superstitious beliefs that it is unlucky to walk underneath a ladder, and unlucky to break a mirror. Things can fall off ladders, so some actual risk exists. And mirrors, when this superstition originated, were quite expensive, so it really was quite unfortunate to break one. Aside from which, you can cut yourself on pieces of broken glass. So some element of truth can be found in these two cases, although the concept of bad luck is generally extended well beyond the point of any scientific validity.
There are several major theories of truth, including the correspondence theory, which posits that truth is what corresponds to reality; the coherence theory, which asserts that truth is determined by the coherence of a set of beliefs or propositions; and the pragmatic theory, which considers truth to be what is useful or effective in practice. Additionally, the deflationary theory suggests that asserting a statement is true is merely a way of asserting the statement itself. Each theory offers a different perspective on how truth can be understood and evaluated.
Bias refers to systematic errors or deviations from the truth in data collection, analysis, interpretation, or review, which can lead to inaccurate conclusions. It can arise from various sources, including researcher expectations, participant selection, or measurement methods. When bias is present, it can distort the results of an experiment or research, leading to misleading findings and potentially affecting subsequent decisions or policies based on that data. To mitigate bias, researchers must implement rigorous methodologies, random sampling, and blind or double-blind study designs.
Science uses rigorous reasoning; pseudoscience uses sloppy reasoning. Science is a sincere effort to discover truth, whatever that truth may be; pseudoscience is used to sell fraudulent products, and is not actually concerned with truth.
Three errors that can affect the truth and validity in an argument are: logical fallacies (flawed reasoning), insufficient evidence to support the claims being made, and biased or unreliable sources. Identifying and addressing these errors is essential for constructing sound and persuasive arguments.
(dubious means of uncertain truth or validity)Examples :The validity of the document was somewhat dubious.I was rather dubious about the reasons he gave for his absence.
Truth conditional semantics is a theory in linguistics that focuses on the relationship between the meaning of a sentence and its truth value. Examples of truth conditional semantics include analyzing how the truth of a sentence is determined by the truth values of its individual parts, such as words and phrases, and how logical operators like "and," "or," and "not" affect the overall truth value of a sentence.
There are many synonyms for truth/soundness. Examples: accurateness, carefulness, certainty, closeness, definiteness, definitiveness, definitude, efficiency, exactitude, exactness, faultlessness, incisiveness, mastery, meticulousness, preciseness, sharpness, skill, skillfulness, strictness, sureness, truthfulness, veracity, and verity.
Reality, validity, verity, facts, certainty, accuracy...
actuality, being, existence, entity, presence, phenomenon, truth, validity
Well from my knowledge you used the term validity wrong, validity is a characteristic of arguments, you meant to say truth which is a characteristic of statements.
Dubious means hesitating or doubtful, questionable in terms of validity or truth.
sojouner truth affect our lives by being such a great person!
examples of moment of truth at a hotel
The three sieves of truth are the sieve of logic, the sieve of experience, and the sieve of authority. These sieves help in discerning the validity of information by evaluating it based on logical reasoning, personal experiences, and the credibility of the source or authority providing the information.
Examples of what?