(1) singularity - it tests only one variable in the situation (2) reproducibility - it can be re-done by other scientists to verify the results (3) utility - the answer matters to human life in some way While most would agree with the first two elements of a "good experiment" listed above, I'm not sure you would find much consensus on the concept of "utility." Whether the result of an experiment is ultimately deemed "useful" to human life has little bearing on the methodology and scientific rigor with which an experiment is conducted. On the other hand, some would say that scientific integrity ("honesty") is a necessary ingredient in any good experiment, while others would say that a good experiment must either prove or disprove a hypothesis...which is, after all, the whole point of conducting the experiment in the first place.
The scientific method that should be done throughout an experiment is to state the problem.
The scientific theory should be changed.
Analyze the experiment to decide whether the results were flawed.
ONE :)
observe and record data.
The scientific method that should be done throughout an experiment is to state the problem.
Experiment
The scientific theory should be changed.
Analyze the experiment to decide whether the results were flawed.
ONE :)
You should include answer to your problem, 1 variable, and a control group.
The scientific method does not detail how you do an experiment, only the method used in general terms.
The monitor and several components inside the cpu. they should be properly disposed of.
observe and record data.
A scientists should form a hypothesis, then conduct an experiment.
observe and record data.
The results go against the thinking of society.