The most important tool for any scientist is curiosity and the desire to know. Without this, the scientist is a mere lab technician. The second most important tool for any scientist is patience. The media love to portray scientists being struck by inspiration and having a eureka moment, but even the most inspired scientist has spent long hours in thought and research preparing her mind for that eureka flash of insight.
The tools that a scientist would use to conduct an experiment would vary greatly on the nature of the experiment.
A scientist needs tools in order to conduct controlled experiments for gathering data. Without the proper materials, a scientist could not make objective observations on their field of research, and so their findings would be meaningless. Also, a scientist needs a large sample size in order to account for all variables that could influence the experiment.
Scientists have to measure things accurately or else science would be pointless,
To an individual it may not seem important, but in the larger pictures scientists are EXTREMELY important, if it wasn't for them we would have no vaccines, modern technology would never have come about and so many more people would be killed by "unknown reasons". Scientific advancements are everywhere just imagine where we would be without them, and where we can go with them.
This is not a complete list by any means but: -A scientist must be completely unbiased. He must be able to recognize his emotions and stop them from influencing his work. -Must be able to interrogate nature. Form multiple hypotheses and perform rigorous tests until all variables are isolated. -A scientist should have an endless supply of tools and processes he can use to find information. A good scientist will know which ones to apply and when. -If there is even one out of 10000 tests that disproves a theory, the theory must be discarded. Those are some important things to keep in mind but a good scientist would have many more codes and rules to follow in his work.
what moved him to become a scientist was that when he was little he would always be in the garage tinkering with his dads tools. what moved him to become a scientist was that when he was little he would always be in the garage tinkering with his dads tools.
The tools that a scientist would use to conduct an experiment would vary greatly on the nature of the experiment.
A scientist needs tools in order to conduct controlled experiments for gathering data. Without the proper materials, a scientist could not make objective observations on their field of research, and so their findings would be meaningless. Also, a scientist needs a large sample size in order to account for all variables that could influence the experiment.
No respected or respectable scientist would think that. So no.
If a scientist were to be dishonest, would people really believe his findings?
an electron microscope
Scientists have to measure things accurately or else science would be pointless,
all scientist believe animals can think because if an animal could not think it would not move or do anything. they need to think 'move' to move etc.
Do you mean "what are"? If so, I would think hypothesis and conclusion...
Tools are important to engineers because they need it to help build, repair or make things if they didn't have it. If they didn't have tools, it would be impossible for them to make a repair or build so it is very important for them to have tools.
it would be tools to cook i think;):):D
werfawg