0
What does a scientist need to review before conducting an experiment?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
results of other experiments related to the subject.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Before conducting an experiment a scientist needs to review?
results of other experiments related to the subject.
What are the Values and traits demonstrated by the scientist?
Scientists have several values by which they live. They always question everything, and also always experiment before they make a decision. They are honest and look for peer review and approval.
What is the process by which scientist check each others work before publication?
Peer review
What is the process in which experts in a given field examine the results and conclusions of a scientist study before that study is excepted for publication?
it needs to be checked
What should an experimenter do after analyzing data?
scientist analyes their experiment
Before conducting an experiment a scientist needs to review?
results of other experiments related to the subject.
A scientist is planning to carry out an experiment on the effect of heat on the function of a certain chemical. which would not be an appropriate first step?
An inappropriate first step would be to start the experiment without conducting a literature review to understand existing knowledge on the chemical and its reaction to heat. This background information is essential for designing a relevant and informative experiment.
What is the process by which scientist grade the work of other scientist before it is publish?
Peer review
What is a scientific method scientist use?
observe, make a hypothesis, experiment, conclusion, peer review, repeat
What are the Values and traits demonstrated by the scientist?
Scientists have several values by which they live. They always question everything, and also always experiment before they make a decision. They are honest and look for peer review and approval.
What should be done after data is collected for an experiment?
The scientist or student scientist should review the results. Conclusions should be drawn based on the results. Then, the hypothesis is reviewed to make sure the results confirm the hypothesis; if not, revise the hypothesis and rerun the experiment.
What is the process by which scientist check each others work before publication?
Peer review
What is the process of which scientist check each others work before publication in science journals?
peer review
What is the process in which experts in a given field examine the results and conclusions of a scientist study before that study is excepted for publication?
it needs to be checked
What should an experimenter do after analyzing data?
scientist analyes their experiment
What are the four steps of the execution sequence of the after action review?
conducting
What is the process called by which scientists checks one anothers work before publication in science journals?
That is called peer review.
