answersLogoWhite

0

To provide an accurate response, I would need to know which article you are referring to and the specific conclusion you have in mind. If you can share more details about the article and the conclusion, I would be happy to help!

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General Science

What conclusion can you draw by examining this evidence?

To draw a conclusion from the evidence, one must analyze the data's patterns, correlations, and implications. If the evidence consistently supports a specific hypothesis or trend, it suggests a strong relationship or causation. Conversely, if the evidence shows contradictions or lacks clear support, it may indicate that further investigation is necessary. Ultimately, the conclusion should reflect the weight and reliability of the evidence presented.


What are the steps for writing a valid scientific explanation?

To write a valid scientific explanation, begin by clearly stating the claim, which is the main conclusion or answer to a specific question. Next, provide evidence that supports the claim, drawing from reliable data, observations, or experiments. Then, include reasoning that connects the evidence to the claim, explaining how the evidence supports your conclusion. Finally, ensure that the explanation is organized and concise, adhering to scientific conventions.


What does it mean when a student data that was collected from an experimental supports their conclusion?

What does it mean when a student data that was collected from an experimental supports their conclusion?Answer this question…


What conclusion can you draw by examining evidence?

The correct conclusion (absolute proof) is found by examining the evidence.


What question would help in determining whether the conclusion above valid?

To determine whether the conclusion is valid, you could ask, "What evidence supports the premises leading to this conclusion?" This question encourages an examination of the logical connections and the reliability of the data or assumptions that underpin the conclusion. Additionally, asking, "Are there any counterexamples or alternative explanations that challenge this conclusion?" can help assess its robustness.

Related Questions

What is the clear nexus between the evidence presented and the conclusion drawn in this case?

The clear connection between the evidence presented and the conclusion drawn in this case is that the evidence directly supports and leads to the conclusion without any ambiguity or doubt.


What evidence supports Holmes's conclusion that Wilson is none too bright?

ihriuqwhg8hf8iojf0


What is a basis for a conclusion?

A basis for a conclusion is the evidence, facts, or reasoning that supports the conclusion being drawn. It is the foundation upon which the conclusion is built and is used to demonstrate the validity and soundness of the conclusion.


List the evidence that supports the conclusion that the Mediterranean sea once dried up?

sdgfg


Cars require a lot of spade in cities. What evidence from the passage best supports this conclusion?

Yes


What evidence supports that the article of confederation helped form America's new government?

Article of confederation did not give power to federal govrnment


How do you write a report on threatened habitats?

# identify the scope of your report # identify your thesis # give supporting evidence # show how evidence supports thesis # conclusion.


What conclusion can you draw by examining this evidence?

To draw a conclusion from the evidence, one must analyze the data's patterns, correlations, and implications. If the evidence consistently supports a specific hypothesis or trend, it suggests a strong relationship or causation. Conversely, if the evidence shows contradictions or lacks clear support, it may indicate that further investigation is necessary. Ultimately, the conclusion should reflect the weight and reliability of the evidence presented.


What evidence did the author use to come to her conclusion in Women in prehistory by Ehrenberg'?

We don't have the article you were given so can't answer the question.


When a premise supports a conclusion individually it supports the conclusion independantly is this statement true or false?

True. If a premise supports a conclusion on its own, it also supports that conclusion independently because the validity of the conclusion is not dependent on any other premises in the argument. Each premise functions as a standalone reason supporting the conclusion.


What are the steps for writing a valid scientific explanation?

To write a valid scientific explanation, begin by clearly stating the claim, which is the main conclusion or answer to a specific question. Next, provide evidence that supports the claim, drawing from reliable data, observations, or experiments. Then, include reasoning that connects the evidence to the claim, explaining how the evidence supports your conclusion. Finally, ensure that the explanation is organized and concise, adhering to scientific conventions.


What is clear convincing evidence?

There is no exactness when describing the relative burdens of proof, different courts have different articulations. Preponderance of the evidence means the evidence supports one conclusion over another no matter how slightly, clear and convincing means the evidence clearly supports one conclusion over another, and beyond a reasonable doubt means that the evidence comes at least close to supporting only one conclusion. Clear and convincing is often required to overcome a legal presumption, such as appealing a guilty plea, finding mental incompetency, or arguing an apparently valid contract is the product of fraud.