Materials that living organisms can't use are excreted from the body as wastes. Elimination or excretion methods vary from species to species; humans and many other animals get rid of wastes mainly through urination and defecation.
Virus
a robot is a non living thing because it has no respiratory system or cardivasicullar system
Leather is considered a non-living thing. It is a material made from the skin of animals through a process called tanning, which preserves the skin and turns it into a durable material. While the skin was once part of a living organism, the leather itself does not exhibit characteristics of living things such as growth, reproduction, or metabolism.
According to scientists, for a thing to be living it needs cell, tissue,organ and an organ system. Things without even one of these are considered non living. Also a need for water.
No, socks are not a living thing- or they might eat your feet! Neither is fire.
If A is not a living thing but consists of genetic material inside a protein coat, it is likely a virus. Viruses are infectious agents that rely on host cell machinery to reproduce and are not considered living organisms since they cannot carry out metabolic processes on their own.
The same thing occurs to all fish and living things when they die, indifferent of the type of material that they are living inside of; they decay and turn into organic matter.
living things are animate.
A non living "thing" cannot move without a living thing or a force moving it.
consumer
NO
yes, all of living things obtain materials and energy, and use that material and energy.
When a living thing dies the cells also die because it know longer a living hing so it will die.
When a living thing is removed from a food web the population of it's predators will decrease and the population of its prey will increase, disrupting the ecosystem of the living thing.
Virus
No it's not as it cannot move by itself.(Science) :)
Follicle mights