The theory is evaluated in the context of the new information. The information may support the theory, it may require a tweak to the theory to accommodate the new information or it may require a major re-think of the theory.
The new information or research will be either republished by the original scientist or sometimes a different group will take it and republish the scientific theory with the new information.
The theory is modified.
When an experiment with new information or technology produces results that support an existing theory, it reinforces the validity of that theory, providing additional evidence for its acceptance within the scientific community. This can lead to increased confidence in the theory and may prompt further research to explore its implications or applications. Additionally, such results can help integrate the new technology or information into established scientific frameworks, facilitating advancements in the field. Ultimately, it contributes to the cumulative nature of scientific knowledge.
The new knowledge is used to reevaluate the theory
When new evidence contradicts a scientific theory, the scientific community typically evaluates the validity of the evidence and the theory itself. If the evidence is robust and replicable, it may lead to a revision or replacement of the existing theory to better explain the observed phenomena. This process is fundamental to the scientific method, promoting the evolution of knowledge as new information emerges. A theory may not be discarded immediately but rather refined to accommodate new insights.
The new information or research will be either republished by the original scientist or sometimes a different group will take it and republish the scientific theory with the new information.
The theory is modified.
When an experiment with new information or technology produces results that support an existing theory, it reinforces the validity of that theory, providing additional evidence for its acceptance within the scientific community. This can lead to increased confidence in the theory and may prompt further research to explore its implications or applications. Additionally, such results can help integrate the new technology or information into established scientific frameworks, facilitating advancements in the field. Ultimately, it contributes to the cumulative nature of scientific knowledge.
the new theory takes the place of the pervious
Evolution is called a theory based on known researched information. When or if some of the information is found to be incorrect or if new information becomes availabe, the theory may be revised.
The new knowledge is used to reevaluate the theory
When new evidence contradicts a scientific theory, the scientific community typically evaluates the validity of the evidence and the theory itself. If the evidence is robust and replicable, it may lead to a revision or replacement of the existing theory to better explain the observed phenomena. This process is fundamental to the scientific method, promoting the evolution of knowledge as new information emerges. A theory may not be discarded immediately but rather refined to accommodate new insights.
The scientific method is a body of techniques used to solve problems. When a scientist gains new information about a theory, the result is usually a new hypothesis.
fsgsderyhthTEH
No. It means that it was the best theory supported at the time it was formulated. Theories can change if new scientific evidence provides new information.
No. It means that it was the best theory supported at the time it was formulated. Theories can change if new scientific evidence provides new information.
a theory is an explanation to a specific question being studied. it has been tested many times. it might be replaced with a new theory because new information come and so the past information will be improved.