In the wild, chimpanzees form social groups composed of 10 to 20 individuals.
experiment
The authors likely chose the marsh grass experiment to illustrate the critical role of hypotheses in guiding scientific inquiry. This experiment demonstrates how a clear hypothesis can lead to systematic investigation, allowing researchers to test their predictions and draw meaningful conclusions about ecological interactions. By showcasing the marsh grass, the authors emphasize how hypotheses can shape our understanding of complex systems and the importance of evidence-based reasoning in scientific research.
An evolutionary biologist is least likely to collect data by doing controlled experiments. Evolutionary biologists study living organisms through the lens of evolutionary theory.
The reviewer would likely consider the experiment invalid if there are significant flaws in the experimental design, such as inadequate control groups, insufficient sample size, or failure to randomize participants. Additionally, inconsistencies in data collection methods or analysis, as well as the presence of confounding variables that were not controlled for, could also lead to a determination of invalidity. If the results cannot be reliably replicated or if ethical standards were not upheld, the experiment would further be deemed invalid.
To answer a specific question, scientist form a hypothesis. If the hypothesis cannot be testable or answered, they'll give you a prediction of what will most likely happen from the results of the hypothesis.
experiment
The authors likely chose the marsh grass experiment to illustrate the critical role of hypotheses in guiding scientific inquiry. This experiment demonstrates how a clear hypothesis can lead to systematic investigation, allowing researchers to test their predictions and draw meaningful conclusions about ecological interactions. By showcasing the marsh grass, the authors emphasize how hypotheses can shape our understanding of complex systems and the importance of evidence-based reasoning in scientific research.
An evolutionary biologist is least likely to collect data by doing controlled experiments. Evolutionary biologists study living organisms through the lens of evolutionary theory.
The reviewer would likely consider the experiment invalid if there are significant flaws in the experimental design, such as inadequate control groups, insufficient sample size, or failure to randomize participants. Additionally, inconsistencies in data collection methods or analysis, as well as the presence of confounding variables that were not controlled for, could also lead to a determination of invalidity. If the results cannot be reliably replicated or if ethical standards were not upheld, the experiment would further be deemed invalid.
To answer a specific question, scientist form a hypothesis. If the hypothesis cannot be testable or answered, they'll give you a prediction of what will most likely happen from the results of the hypothesis.
Increasing the temperature or increasing the concentration of substrate would most likely increase the rate of an enzyme-controlled reaction during an experiment. This is because higher temperatures or substrate concentrations can speed up the rate of enzyme-substrate collisions, leading to more enzymatic reactions taking place.
plan the experiment
The most likely hypothesis for the experiment was that increasing the temperature would speed up the reaction.
Fair
If you are closely following the logic of science in sociological research, you are likely to be using the quantitative research method. This method involves the collection of numerical data through surveys, experiments, or statistical analysis to test hypotheses and make generalizations about the population being studied.
ok
There are a number of things that would most likely interest an environmental scientist. This will be anything that has to do with the environment and the various things that affect it.A+ water pollutionwater pollution