An assumption based on evidence is a conclusion or belief that is formed by interpreting or inferring information derived from observations, data, or factual circumstances. This type of assumption is grounded in empirical support rather than mere speculation, making it more reliable. It often serves as a starting point for further investigation or reasoning in various fields, such as science, research, and decision-making. However, it remains subject to reevaluation as new evidence emerges.
There is at least some reasonable and verifiable evidence behind a warranted assumption. I think that even with evidence, the consequences of an assumption have to be considered. Evidence is not necessarily proof. If harm will come to a person because of an assumption, then I would consider the assumption unwarranted. You can't go off hurting people because you think you're clever. That kind of behavior will come back to bite you.
A key assumption of the scientific method is that the natural world is consistent and predictable, allowing for observations and experiments to yield reliable results. This means that phenomena can be tested and understood through empirical evidence and reproducible experiments. Additionally, it assumes that all scientific claims can be challenged and revised based on new evidence.
theory
I think you're talking about making an assumption, at least that's what I'm getting from the question. Hope that helpsExplaining or interpreting the things you observe based on reasoning from things you already know is called making an inference.
An assumption is basically a hunch or feeling. This has no evidence, or not enough behind it, to be fully regarded as a valid theory. A hypothesis is like an assumption, however, this can be researched and will be during an experiment. The experiment will either prove the hypothesis right or wrong.
A warranted assumption is an assumption that has evidence and reasonable interpretation of this evidence to support it. But, it's still an assumption and should only be used as a guide in finding the real facts. A warranted assumption should not be acted on if any harm will come of it.
An assumption based on prior experience is when we anticipate a similar outcome or situation based on past encounters or knowledge. This assumption is made without having concrete evidence or information to support it but relies on our past understanding of similar events.
A supposition is a belief or idea based on limited evidence, while an assumption is a belief taken for granted without proof.
a tentative assumption. (APEX)ORA tentative proposal based on available evidence. (APEX)
A warranted assumption is an assumption that has evidence and reasonable interpretation of this evidence to support it. But, it's still an assumption and should only be used as a guide in finding the real facts. A warranted assumption should not be acted on if any harm will come of it.
Reality assumptions are beliefs that each of us hold concerning what we feel is true and factual about the way things are in the world. A value assumption is when we give things an assumed value. An example is the belief that humans have a higher value than animals.
I do not support your assumption. Your assumption is based upon few facts.
There is at least some reasonable and verifiable evidence behind a warranted assumption. I think that even with evidence, the consequences of an assumption have to be considered. Evidence is not necessarily proof. If harm will come to a person because of an assumption, then I would consider the assumption unwarranted. You can't go off hurting people because you think you're clever. That kind of behavior will come back to bite you.
The word you are looking for is "speculation." Speculation involves forming conclusions based on assumptions rather than direct evidence or observation.
To accept something without proof is to make an assumption. An example of a sentence using the word assumption would be: "She wished she hadn't made the assumption that the trip would be short; now all she wanted was to go home."
Standard-based performance is based on the assumption that performance can be measured. It is difficult to objectively measure job performance in many positions.
It is an inference :)