A valid conclusion is when your conclusion is written using the text you have and get it right.
A deductively valid argument is if the premises are true then the conclusion is certainly true, not possibly true. The definition does not say that the conclusion is true.
Science has no agreed upon valid answers. Generally in science, validity refers to the extent in which a conclusion or measurement corresponds accurately to reality.
When data gathered in the research process supports its validity
for Gate exam there is a validity but i think for pgeset there is no validity.
others type of validity of a test other than content
A valid research measure is based on the concept of conclusion and measurement with the real world. The validity measures what it claims to measure.
A deductively valid argument is if the premises are true then the conclusion is certainly true, not possibly true. The definition does not say that the conclusion is true.
Paco and Eva's data showed a clear trend that supported my conclusion. Their findings aligned with my hypothesis and provided additional evidence to support the validity of the conclusion drawn. The consistency between our data reinforced the strength of the conclusion reached.
Science has no agreed upon valid answers. Generally in science, validity refers to the extent in which a conclusion or measurement corresponds accurately to reality.
A valid research measure is based on the concept of conclusion and measurement with the real world. The validity measures what it claims to measure.
The keys or tips to raise suspicion about the validity of an argument is to think logically and see if the conclusion supports the argument. If the argument conflicts with the evidence a person should be suspicious.
The Accuracy of the results.The Validity of the experiment (does it work as planned and actually reflect your question)The Repeatability. (if you - and especially others - cant repeat it then it is not valid conclusion)Possible Variables that would effect the result.
When data gathered in the research process supports its validity
If you gain internal validity do you lose external validity
In invalid argument is one in which the premises do not necessitate the truth of the conclusion. An argument's validity or invalidity does NOT depend on the actual truth of the premises, just what they would entail IF they are true.
for Gate exam there is a validity but i think for pgeset there is no validity.
examples of internal and external validity