feedback
Data obtained from an experiment is the results you got from whatever test or experiment you did. Data obtained for a research paper is the information you got from your research. Basically, it is the data/info/results/etc you need to come to a certain conclusion.
No... scientific inquiry begins by coming up with a question. From there you develop a hypothesis, test the hypothesis, alter your hypothesis if need be, test again, etc. Only after you have data that supports your hypothesis (if it ever does) do you draw any conclusions. If your data consistently does not support your hypothesis, no matter how it is modified, you may draw conclusions about your basic contentions as well. YES BUT..... what should you ask yourself in drawing a conclusion about an experiment?
Scientific inquiry attempts to avoid bias, prejudice, falsification of data, oversimplification, dishonesty of any type, superstition, etc. The investigator attempts to observe things as they are, rather than trying to force the observation to fit the theory.
A controlled experiment compares results through various methods. Some being a graph, an average, a diagram... etc.
test your hypothesis.
It is a 'closed question' where it can turn to a "leading question" depending on your response. First, it is an inquiry as he is asking for an information, second whether it is factual or not, still depends on the response. But in its simplest form, this is just a "closed question" that can be answered with red, yellow, blues, and etc.
An inquiry is a question you have about something. If you inquire about a topic, such as you did on this website, your question is an inquiry. Another example is a scientific inquiry- a scientist has a question about something, so they use an inquiry tool (such as a thermometer, scale, etc.) to answer their question.
The dealer site does not give that information with a unit inquiry. All it shows is warranty info, purchase date, etc.
An inquiry database, in other words, a place where questions are asked, simply asks questions. The inquire so no fraud is committed and etc. That is what an inquiry database does.
Answering a question can be done by simply stating your opinion on an issue or by giving what you believe to be the proper answer. A science inquiry on the other hand requires you stick to established scientific methods of inquiry (read available scientific literature on the issue, find out what scientific consensus currently is, take into account credible alternative hypothesis, do scientific research, etc.) and the outcome of scientific inquiry does not necessarily have to coincide with what your opinion on the issue was before you started the inquiry.
following the rules etc
Data obtained from an experiment is the results you got from whatever test or experiment you did. Data obtained for a research paper is the information you got from your research. Basically, it is the data/info/results/etc you need to come to a certain conclusion.
No... scientific inquiry begins by coming up with a question. From there you develop a hypothesis, test the hypothesis, alter your hypothesis if need be, test again, etc. Only after you have data that supports your hypothesis (if it ever does) do you draw any conclusions. If your data consistently does not support your hypothesis, no matter how it is modified, you may draw conclusions about your basic contentions as well. YES BUT..... what should you ask yourself in drawing a conclusion about an experiment?
Not always - you can write a sentance such as: This experiment is complex (you will need: salt, water, etc.) or; This experiment is complex (you will need many items), such as salt, water, etc.
an experiment where the subjects know what is going on. they are not tricked or fooled with any tactics to increase validity such as placebos etc.
Exam, quiz, trial, assessment, experiment etc.
Scientific inquiry attempts to avoid bias, prejudice, falsification of data, oversimplification, dishonesty of any type, superstition, etc. The investigator attempts to observe things as they are, rather than trying to force the observation to fit the theory.