Science is based on observation, rather than on dogma. Everything in science is constantly being tested. Scientists are trained to take nothing on faith, but to observe as much as they can. Scientists know that they may observe something that other scientists missed. So scientific error (or fraud) does get detected.
In order for any theory to be considered "scientific" it must be testable ...
thus it must be "falseafiable".
Theories that can not be tested are just wild ideas.
dggbh
\
hint: curiosity...
No, it isn't. If you think in terms of "research and development", then science is the research piece. Science uncovers concepts and principles. Development happens when engineers and other ridiculously brilliant and talented "science types" take the concepts and principles from science and find ways to turn them into practical applications or devices.Of course there are important overlaps, but science is primarily a way of knowing and not primarily a way of inventing.
Science has 75 different fields. Everywhere you look there is science improving your way of life. When a father takes his daughter to school in a vehicle a science is involved there. When a young boy makes his homework in a computer there is science involved there. When a person cooks his meal, there is science involved in the making of the appliances used to cook. everywhere you look, there will be some kind of science involved even when you are only surrounded by nature.
Chefs use science in their work when they make a recipe that evolves of chemical/physical change with food. Chefs use science when they are using the gas/electrical appliances on the stove. Chefs use science when they practice out the recipe they use taste, feel see etc. Chefs use science when types up their recipe on the computer using computer science. Chefs use science when they touch the solid, liquid or gas. Also when they boil water, freeze chocolate etc.
A scientist is trying to figure something out. The scientist makes a guess and figures out a way to test that guess. That is called an experimental investigation.
study for a qualification in science
Its strenghts, its limitations, and its interactions with our culture.
Science is a series of proven tests. We learn through experimentation and science has very specific ways of testing and then proving things which allow us to learn about how and why things work the way they do.
Incalculable. There's no way of knowing the total amount every employee makes and no way of knowing the total amount of Money Disneyland brings in.
Anything that is realistic and something you can teach someone. Science is a way of knowing so you can predict anything.
There is no way of knowing, that's what makes earthquakes so very terrifying.
No, it isn't. If you think in terms of "research and development", then science is the research piece. Science uncovers concepts and principles. Development happens when engineers and other ridiculously brilliant and talented "science types" take the concepts and principles from science and find ways to turn them into practical applications or devices.Of course there are important overlaps, but science is primarily a way of knowing and not primarily a way of inventing.
Science has 75 different fields. Everywhere you look there is science improving your way of life. When a father takes his daughter to school in a vehicle a science is involved there. When a young boy makes his homework in a computer there is science involved there. When a person cooks his meal, there is science involved in the making of the appliances used to cook. everywhere you look, there will be some kind of science involved even when you are only surrounded by nature.
You really can't . The wind is what makes it drift and you have no way of knowing what the wind is like at 300- 5,000 feet.
no
What is the importance of knowing the proper way of handling a Bunsen burner?
The root word is scientia = to know. From the latin. Hence Prescience - to know beforehand. Conscience - to know it is wrong. Omniscience - to know everything. (we've all met one!)
The term "scientific progression" suggests the changing of ideas with respect to natural sciences, a way of knowing, yet how can science be held as truth or as knowledge if it is only temporary and incomplete.