For a scientist's claim to be considered valid, it must be based on empirical evidence gathered through systematic observation, experimentation, or research. The claim should be reproducible, meaning that other researchers can obtain similar results under similar conditions. Additionally, it should be peer-reviewed and withstand scrutiny from the scientific community, ensuring that it adheres to established methodologies and ethical standards.
repeated trials
Draw a valid conclusion for that experiment.
A conclusion or assertion would be considered to be scientifically valid if the data are accurate and the reasoning based on that data is, as far as we can tell, correctly reasoned. Science does not deal in absolute truth, which is why scientists prefer the term valid, which indicates that as far as we presently know, this statement is true, although new data and/or new reasoning may cause us to change our minds in the future.
To write a valid scientific explanation, begin by clearly stating the claim, which is the main conclusion or answer to a specific question. Next, provide evidence that supports the claim, drawing from reliable data, observations, or experiments. Then, include reasoning that connects the evidence to the claim, explaining how the evidence supports your conclusion. Finally, ensure that the explanation is organized and concise, adhering to scientific conventions.
If a conclusion is valid, similar investigations by other scientists should result in the same conclusion.
The claim that can be asserted without evidence requires evidence to be considered valid.
A claim is considered valid if it is supported by credible evidence, logically structured, and consistent with established facts or principles. Additionally, a valid claim should be clear and specific, allowing for reasonable interpretation and assessment. The strength of a claim also depends on the reliability of the sources used to back it up and its ability to withstand scrutiny or counterarguments.
they have to get entouch with the federal food assoc.
Yes, a hole-punched ID is considered valid as long as it is still legible and contains all necessary information for identification purposes.
The quit claim deed is a valid document by utself and as such does not have to be protected by recording it in the recording offices books. This act does not reflect the intent of the grantor. The deeding over of property to another person. The recording reflects to the recorder information only not intent.
A valid claim in math is that you prove whenether the question or answer is resonable. in other words, you have to tell if it is biased or not biased. Biased is invalid claim.
If a quit claim deed states a person is unmarried and falsley documented is the deed considered valid under Alabama law
In Kentucky, the statute of limitations for filing an insurance claim is typically 2 years. This means that you have 2 years from the date of the incident or discovery of a covered loss to file a claim with your insurance company. It is important to act within this timeframe to ensure your claim is considered valid.
Alchemists are not considered scientists because their practices were largely based on mystical or philosophical belief systems rather than empirical evidence and systematic experimentation, which are key components of the scientific method. Additionally, the goals of alchemy, such as transmuting base metals into gold or achieving immortality, are not considered achievable or scientifically valid.
A valid report view must present data in a clear and organized manner, allowing users to easily understand and interpret the information. A view that is cluttered, confusing, or lacks necessary context would not be considered a valid report view.
Yes, a passport is considered a valid form of identification.
repeated trials